Search Results For Gang Stalking

Search Results For Gang Stalking

Attached is two reports of my blog the list is in chronological order in which the searches were received. The first broken down by Country and the second is the same only broken down by City. This report shows the search terms used to find my website since March 17 2010. Based on the search terms I do believe most of these peoples have witnessed first hand this Gang Stalking phenomena or supposed directed energy weapons (Demonic sorceresses, Black Magic if you will). The search terms I believe tell a lot and also indicate this phenomenon is a global epidemic.

Note I notice this reporting tool is flawed and does not log all the activity as it is often shows less page loads then the built in stats log that is supplied by my blog host. The numbers I believe are greater then what shows up in this report. . I know I had many hits from China, Iran, The united Emirates and other middle Eastern Countries. I was beginning to suspect that my reporting data base has been hacked but the more likely reason Google has purposely blocked stats from politically sensitive regions as to not alarm the powers. I will swear on a stack of bibles peoples from China, Iran The United Emirates have visited my site. The records of these visits did exist at one point but now they seemed to have vanished.

Link 1

Link 2

Related Images:

Human Protection Software Suite (Episode: 183)

Human Protection Software Suite (Episode: 183)

Dear All,

I want to first wish you all a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

Anyway, the interview concerning the Human Protection Software Suite was an absolute success! Joselle Rozario provided positive testimony and Mellhedek who designed the software gave us a full view on how it will help us.

The suite is expected to be release in late January. Full details will be provided when the date is announce.

In the meantime, if you were not present for the live interview and want to listen to it, please feel free to visit this link:

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=83319&cmd=tc

Go to Episode 183 (December 23, 2011/9p EST)

If you have trouble accessing this link, please go to http://talkshoe.com type “83319” in the search area. You can download the interview or your can listen from your computer. It is listed under Human Protection Software Suite (Episode 183)

Thanks for your time and Happy New Year!

Chris J. Brunson

Important Links:

http://wewillbefr33.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/the-human-protection-software-suite-with-special-guests-mellhedek-and-joselle-on-government-sponsored-stalking-gss-conference-call-friday-december-23-2011/

http://www.facebook.com/mellhedek

http://www.facebook.com/wewillbefr33

Related Images:

Tonight’s GSS conference call guests will be…

Tonight’s GSS conference call guests will be Joselle Rozario and Mell Mellhedek. The topic will be: Human Protection Software Suite. Your comments and questions will be appreciated.

Government Sponsored Stalking (GSS) Conference Calls are held every Friday Nights at 9PM EST or 6PM PST. The call is hosted on talkshoe.com or call: 724-444-7444 code: 83319 # pin 1 #

What you expect to learn from this call is how the technology can reduce the attacks so common with Targeted Individuals of Electronic Harassment, Organized Stalking, Implantations and Chem-trails spraying.

Conference call rules:

Chatters: make sure you direct your questions to the person by name. Callers: before you confront our guests, please say your name and than say the name of the guest who will like to direct your question. Thank you.

Your participation will gladly be appreciated.

Chris J. Brunson
Investigator

Homepage: http://govsponsoredstalking.info

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/qolspony
Photobucket: http://s947.photobucket.com/home/qolspony/index
Talkshoe: http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=83319&am…
Yahoo Groups: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/governmentsponsoredstalking/
YOUTUBE: http://www.youtube.com/user/qolspony

AFFIDAVIT: http://govsponsoredstalking.info/AFFIDAVIT.pdf

Other Conference Calls:

KELB: 724-444-7444 code: 80812 # pin: 1 (Wed./Sat. 9P EST)

Related Images:

GSS Friday Night 9PM EST or 6PM PST Conference Call 122311

GSS Friday Night 9PM EST or 6PM PST Conference Call 122311

Government Sponsored Stalking (GSS) Conference Calls are held every Friday Nights at 9PM EST or 6PM PST. The call is hosted on talkshoe.com or call: 724-444-7444 code: 83319 # pin 1 #

Topic: Human Protection Software Suite Developer: Mell Mellhedek

About US: Our Human Protection Software Suite is a composition of many software installed in the more…

Related Images:

Data Asylum

Data Asylum

Site Inception: October 15, 2011 • Last Updated: October 25, 2011
Introduction

In 1999 the world changed. The money trust changed, the law, technology, and the general direction of the planet. In order to even remotely grasp what is happening you must disconnect your mind from the last century’s way of thinking. Failure to change the way you think will preclude you from seeing reality accurately. There is no money anymore, taxes are a thing of the past.

So what we now have is a real brave new world. The purpose of this site is to simply show how they control everyone on demand, as well as end the confusion around the subject of chemtrails and how they fit into the larger picture while showing how the media and movies are conditioning the mind of the general public. This web site is my account of the entire last decade. I’m sure I’m missing something here or there, but this is 95% accurate I think.

The Reason for Everything

Let’s just get right too it. Forget everything you know. Here it is, the epitome of reality. This video is the best example that summarizes what’s happening or has happened in your body already. This is the most prevalent secret in the whole world because it has been forced onto everyone unknowingly.

What you see here is a nano-bot encapsulating a neuron or synapse (for example your purkinje neurons) or other nerve ending/bridge. It’s only a simulation, but accurately summaries everything that has happened in the past decade. This allows complete control of the host (your body) remotely as demonstrated repeatedly in the movies. A more sophisticated set of nano-bots would subsequently allow for a complete and full BioAPI to be installed without the host (you) even knowing it.

The basic idea consists of a set of nano-wires tethered to electronics in the main catheter such that they will spread out in a “bouquet” arrangement into a particular portion of the brain’s vascular system. Such arrangement could support a very large number of probes (in the millions). Each n-wire would be used to record, very securely, electrical activity of a single or small group of neurons without invading the brain parenchyma. Obviously, the advantage of such system is that it would not interfere with either the blood flow exchange of gases or produce any type of disruption of brain activity, due to the tiny space occupied in the vascular bed.

Source

What is the Purpose of Chemtrails

Chemtrails are a huge logistical operation. Larger than the hoover damn, trans-alaska pipeline or moon landing. Its large. And expensive. The biggest mistake one can make is assuming there is only one reason for chemtrails. There are about five or six reasons and possibly more. The top six are listed below with a brief summary. This web site is concerned with the last.

Blocking the Sun: This is the standard reason given to idiots in the government. We need to secretly stop global warming, so keep it a secret that we’re spraying. Global warming is the catch all con for everyone in the government. If you’re smarter than this they’ll give you a better reason.

Blocking the Sun (Again): A reduction in sun light across the planet works well to decrease crop yields slightly. This is part of the requirement to engineer a food crisis and bring in a famine. This is tied in with the disappearing bees too but this site does not get into that.

Superheating the Atmosphere: In order to create earthquakes and steer hurricanes (for example hurricane Katrina in New Orleans) the atmosphere needs to be more conductive for electricity so installations such as HAARP can work their magic. So the chemtrails spray barium and aluminum among other things to create a more conductive upper atmosphere.

Health Erosion: As a side effect everyone’s health and immune systems become more compromised. This is usually not an issue for most healthy people. Older people on average will now die sooner and any health complication is slightly more likely to be fatal. This is both a side effect of spraying and intentional. Anything to increase the kill rate without raising many alarm bells.

Climate Modification: To help or hurt crops, keep skys clear for a major event (like the Olympics), cause a typhoon, etc.

Nano-fiber Propagation: To universally install a BioAPI in everyone they need to spray nano-fibers. These fibers cannot be put into the food supply or given in some other way, the uptake across the population would take forever and not propagate very efficiently. It’s much easily just to spray everyone like an insect; and because it’s happening to everyone and universal the herd mentality of the unwashed masses then justifies it.

Nano-fiber Basics

Nano-fibers specifically are a transport mechanism. Nothing more. They hold a payload for delivery. A payload that would otherwise be compromised by the sun or atmosphere or not make it to its destination (your body). Such as a virus, RNA, aluminum, nano-components, etc. The fibers are (surprisingly) quite harmless as everyone has them. Examples of these fibers can be found all over the internet or in the physical examples section of this site. The fibers must be independently sprayed, if they we’re added to the jet fuel the extreme heat would destroy the payload.

So it’s not the fiber that is critical, it’s the payload.

Phases

There are essentially two phases involved with the installation of the BioAPI. I categorize it as phase 1 and phase 2. If you can imagine a new laptop computer, all it has is the operating system like Windows, so it’s kind of useless. This would be the equivalent to phase 1. So a new computer can be remotely controlled (aka phase 1) by your IT tech support guy, but that is all. There’s no programs installed (provided by phase 2) to do
anything else with it.

Phase 1: Everyone on the planet is effected and involved in this phase. Everyone to some extent has the nano-fibers within their body cavity, and therefore wired. Side effects include a clicking sound from within the skull and basic annoying body complications like aching joints. This phase actually provides complete remote control of your speech and thought patterns through suggestion (subconsciously). I guess about 90% of the populace has this phase complete.

Phase 2: This phase must be triggered and is extreme. It completely compromises your health and can do anything from kill you to simply monitor you. This phase cannot be forced onto you like phase 1 (technically it can but they don’t do that yet). This involves multiple nano-sensors from ocular to heart and everything in between. I figure about 2% of the population has gone through this phase. If this phase is triggered in you they consider you evil as shown within the media examples page of this site. You must do something to trigger this phase, including eating cheap red meat, kissing specific people, using specific corporate health care/beauty products, etc. The objective they are reaching for here is to connect each event with a deadly sin of some sort. For example morgellons would be connected with vanity because your skin goes to hell. Ultimately this phase provides complete remote control of your body and mind, including the monitoring of your emotions, thoughts, body functions and everything in between.

Side Effects

Of course with something as extreme as nanotech being installed within people’s body’s you would assume there would be health implications and side effects. This is correct and covered on this site. The approach to handle these side effects has been one of “embrace and extend” it’s called. There are several examples in the media section that show how the specific side effects listed below are recognized and then associated with something ridiculous or stupid which then discounts the authenticity in the mind of the viewer. In effect convincing the viewer to dismiss a real side effect as being something that’s too crazy to be real. Each side effect is dealt with in a media example. Additional technical possibilities are also talked about in BioAPI section.

Phase 1 & 2 – Cranium Clicking/Screeching: A phase 1 side effect goes back as early as 2001. Exactly what is happening is not completely known but involves some sort of nano-chip being installed/operated in the cranium (your head) of the host. This is probably the equivalent of a CPU of some sort. The actual clicking/screeching sound observed is usually at night on average once a month and only lasts for a few seconds. Completely painless and easily ignored or passed off by the person.

Phase 1 & 2 – Aching Joints, Headaches, Fatigue, etc.: The saturation of nano-fibers has different effects on different people. The sheer numbers involved results is a random combination of health implications. Most people will not notice anything, or pass any slight symptom off as getting older. Other people who have more of a reaction will go to the doctor and get diagnosed with fibromyalgia. Fibromyalgia is a catch all disease that was created about a decade ago to give doctors something to tell the patient when they complained. The doctors can’t accurate diagnose or understand what or why a patient is feeling a certain way, so the corrupt medical establishment gives them this nonsense to spew. These side effects are primarily phase 1 but are a constant problem across the board.

Phase 2 – Continued Itching Skin: Often a specific part of the person’s body (for example the left elbow) will become constantly itchy much more than the rest of the body permanently. This is intentional and is a sign to others that they have phase 2. This is reflected quite clearly in this media example.

Phase 2 – Burning Smell: Phase 2 encapsulates the person’s ability to smell to they can read/write scents to the person. I have no idea why they want to know what you’re smelling. When inhaling or specifically exhaling quickly its often a burning/smoke smell that is noticed. It’s unknown why, this must be an unwanted side effect. Or more accurately to encapsulate any neuron in the body involved in sensing (for example, smell, taste, etc.) there obviously must be some minor side effect. Interestingly when I cry the smell is amplified and it smells like buttered popcorn of all things. An example of how the media discounts this is demonstrated in the movie Bandits (2001).

Phase 2 – The Left Eye: One of the high level concepts they push in the movies is the left eye is evil for some insane reason. In phase 2 an actual nano-camera will be installed in the left eye. People with this might comment on how they feel like there’s a small bump in their eye under slightly drier conditions such as when going to sleep at night. This is documented in the physical example page. Note if you figure out you have a camera in the left eye they will probably install something in the right eye too.

Phase 2 – Permanent Metallic Taste: Some people will comment on a metallic taste in the mouth. Typically when going to sleep it becomes prevalent. This is mostly a direct response to be monitored. The more they monitor you or your BioAPI the more of a metallic taste you’ll receive. It is not a side effect of medication, that’s the typical response a doctor will give you. If you are not on medication and otherwise completely healthy and all of a sudden have a permanent metallic taste in your mouth, you are being monitored 24/7.

Phase 2 – Morgellons: Morgellon’s can strike anyone. Its a problem with the nano-bots and fibers, whether intentional or accidental. The body’s immune system can’t see or recognize the fibers at all. So when the body can’t accept the fibers anymore it beings to push them out through the skin. But the skin is a barrier because the fibers are too large. So the skin breaks up which is why people get lesions. Note that technically everyone has morgellons (nano-fibers), the actual mogellon’s symptoms are when the person’s body tries to get rid of them the only way possible. Some more conclusions can be seen here as well as a media reference.

Evidence
Ultimately you need some proof. This is very difficult, as we all don’t exactly have nano-tech labs in our basements. The only thing possible at this point in time is to put out the physical evidence that is known and back it up with media/movie supporting clips. A complete list of unbelievable things this technology can do is listed here
.

Related Images:

Nanotechnology coming to a brain near you

Posted: July 5, 2007
Nanotechnology coming to a brain near you
(Nanowerk Spotlight) If you have seen the movie The Matrix then you are familiar with ‘jacking in’ – a brain-machine neural interface that connects a human brain to a computer network. For the time being, this is still a sci-fi scenario, but don’t think that researchers are not heavily working on it. What is already reality today is something called neuroprosthetics, an area of neuroscience that uses artificial microdevices to replace the function of impaired nervous systems or sensory organs. Different biomedical devices implanted in the central nervous system, so-called neural interfaces, already have been developed to control motor disorders or to translate willful brain processes into specific actions by the control of external devices. These implants could help increase the independence of people with disabilities by allowing them to control various devices with their thoughts (not surprisingly, the other candidate for early adoption of this technology is the military). The potential of nanotechnology application in neuroscience is widely accepted. Especially single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) have received great attention because of their unique physical and chemical features, which allow the development of devices with outstanding electrical properties. In a crucial step towards a new generation of future neuroprosthetic devices, a group of European scientists developed a SWCNT/neuron hybrid system and demonstrated that carbon nanotubes can directly stimulate brain circuit activity.
Examples of existing brain implants include brain pacemakers, to ease the symptoms of such diseases as epilepsy, Parkinson’s Disease, dystonia and recently depression; retinal implants that consist of an array of electrodes implanted on the back of the retina, a digital camera worn on the user’s body, and a transmitter/image processor that converts the image to electrical signals sent to the brain; and most recently, cyberkinetics devices such as the BrainGate™ Neural Interface System that has been used successfully by quadriplegic patients to control a computer with thoughts alone.
Thanks to the application of recent advances in nanotechnology to the nervous system, a novel generation of neuro-implantable devices is on the horizon, capable of restoring function loss as a result of neuronal damage or altered circuit function. The field will very soon be mature enough to explore in vivo neural implants in animal models.
“We developed an integrated system coupling SWCNTs to an ex vivo reduced nervous system, where a mesh of SWCNTs deposited on glass acts as a growing substrate for rat cultured neurons” Dr. Maurizio Prato and Dr. Laura Ballerini explain to Nanowerk. “We demonstrated that neurons form functional healthy networks in vitro over a period of several days and developed a dense array of connection fibers, unexpectedly intermingled with the SWCNT meshwork with tight contacts with the cellular membranes.
Ballerini, an associate professor in Physiology, and Prato, a professor in the Department of Pharmaceutical Science both at the University of Trieste, Italy, are also involved in the European Neuronano project, an advanced scientific multi-disciplinary project to develop neuronal nano-engineering by integrating neuroscience with materials science, micro- and nanotechnology. The Neuronano network’s major aim is to integrate carbon nanotubes with multi electrode array technology to develop a new generation biochips to help repair damaged central nervous system tissues.
“For the first time, we show how electrical stimulation delivered through carbon nanotubes activates neuronal electrical signaling and network synaptic interactions” says Dr. Michele Giugliano, a researcher at the Brain Mind Institute at the Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne in Switzerland. He is one of Ballerini’s co-authors of their recent paper “Interfacing Neurons with Carbon Nanotubes: Electrical Signal Transfer and Synaptic Stimulation in Cultured Brain Circuits”. “We developed a mathematical model of the neuron/SWCNT electrochemical interface. This model provides for the first time the basis for understanding the electrical coupling between neurons and SWCNT.”
Over the past few years, there has been tremendous interest in exploiting nanotechnology materials and devices either in clinical or in basic neurosciences research. However, so far the interactions between carbon nanotubes and cellular physiology have been studied and characterized as an issue of biochemical mechanisms involving molecular transport, cellular adhesion, biocompatibility, etc. These new findings boost scientists’ understanding of interfacing the nervous system with conductive nanoparticles, at the very fast time scale of electrical neuronal activity which in mammals determines behavior, cognition and learning.
“Recently, the Neuronano research group pioneered the exploration of carbon nanotubes as artificial means to interact with the collective electrical activity emerging in networks of vertebrate neurons” says Giugliano. “Biocompatibility of carbon nanotubes has been shown in the literature and several groups recently have attempted coupling neurons to carbon nanotubes to probe or elicit electrical impulses. However, specific considerations of the electrophysiological techniques that are crucial for understanding signal-transduction and electrical coupling were underestimated.”
The researchers achieved direct SWCNT–neuron interactions by culturing rat hippocampal cells on a film of purified SWCNTs for 8–14 days, to allow for neuronal growth. This neuronal growth was accompanied by variable degree of neurite extension on the SWCNT mat. A detailed scanning electron microscopy analysis suggested the presence of tight interactions between cell membranes and SWCNTs at the level of neuronal processes and cell surfaces
“With regards to the technological processes involved in the SWCNT deposition on glass, the chemical processes we previously developed and used in this work is the only one effectively employing no intermediate functional group to anchor the carbon nanotubes to the glass substrate, thus allowing a unique perspective of the properties and interaction of nanotubes alone” says Prato.
The scientists point out that their results as a whole represent a crucial step towards future neuroprosthetic devices, exploiting the surprising mechanical and (semi)conductive properties of carbon nanotubes. This field is now closer to a quantitative understanding of how precise electrical stimulation may be delivered in deep structures by ‘brain pacemakers’ in the treatment of brain diseases.
“From current and previous results of our group, it seems that carbon nanotubes could functionally interact with electrical nervous activity even in the absence of signal-conditioning integrated electronics and explicit external control” says Ballerini. “In fact, at least to some extent, (semi)conductive properties of the nanotubes might facilitate the emergence of synaptic activity. These achievements offer a promising strategy to further develop next-generation materials to be used in neurobiology.”
By Michael Berger, Copyright 2007 Nanowerk LLC

Related Images:

Mind-Reading Technology

February 10, 2007

Mind-Reading Technology

In case you needed any more evidence that science and technology are racing ahead faster than our ability to understand the implications and prepare for responsible governance, read this:

A team of world-leading neuroscientists has developed a powerful technique that allows them to look deep inside a person’s brain and read their intentions before they act.The research breaks controversial new ground in scientists’ ability to probe people’s minds and eavesdrop on their thoughts, and raises serious ethical issues over how brain-reading technology may be used in the future.

The team used high-resolution brain scans to identify patterns of activity before translating them into meaningful thoughts, revealing what a person planned to do in the near future. It is the first time scientists have succeeded in reading intentions in this way.

Whether it is neuroscience, genetic engineering, or nanotechnology, it is clear that a great deal more emphasis should be placed on studying the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of these emerging technologies.
Twotracks2

We’re not advocating to slow down the technical track — that would be nearly impossible, and unwise to boot — but governments, corporate groups, and international issue organizations must prioritize and amply budget for serious applied studies of risks, benefits, and potential regulatory strategies.

Related Images:

Top 10 Reasons for Using Nanotech in Food

Top 10 Reasons for Using Nanotech in Food

(The Demonic Criminals Get “us” to believe that these things are good for us, later we found it being used for mind control.)

Abstract:
Nanotechnology is in your food. Not all food. But those tiny, specialized particles (1,000 of them together would approximate the thickness of a piece of office paper), which are already advancing research in energy, biotech and medicine, are finding their way into food stuffs. Used in different ways, nanoparticles can extend food shelf life, add health benefits, impact flavor or even signal bacteria contamination.

But many people watching these innovations are shaking their heads with distrust.

“Companies are engaged in nanoscale research; however, they do not publicly declare so partly because of uncertainty in the safety assessment and regulatory climate,” said Betty Bugusu, research scientist at the Institute of Food Technologists in Washington, D.C.

Think of the arguments surrounding genetically modified crops this past decade and you’ll have some idea of the controversy over nanotechnology being used in food. Add to that the reality that companies aren’t always forthcoming about their use of nanotechnology when developing new products. The secrecy intended to deter competitors from stealing ideas can also make identifying potential harm more difficult for the regulatory agencies trying to manage risks and create law for this emerging technology.

Nonetheless, nanotechnology could offer benefits in food safety, storage, packaging and nutrition.

“I, personally, think that the most important applications of nanotechnology and food are in the area of sensing — spoilage, bacteria, other contaminants; crop safety,” said Lori Sheremeta, research officer for the Alberta Ingenuity Fund, National Institute for Nanotechnology in Edmonton, Canada.
The Project for Emerging Nanotechnologies, which has a database of consumer products and primarily government-funded nanotech grant proposals, reflects Sheremeta’s perspective. Two areas with the greatest number of scientists in pursuit of patents are detection of bacteria and contaminants, and development of better food storage.

Hongda Chen of the USDA’s Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service in Washington, D.C., sees additional benefits in nutrition. People spend money on vitamins, minerals and other nutritional supplements out of concern that ordinary food isn’t providing them adequately with nutrients. Adding encapsulated nano-nutrients to food and beverages provides a two-in-one solution, Chen says.

“Nutrient delivery through nanotechnology is an area that can help improve health and save money,” he said. “This still requires more research, but that’s the visionary goal.”

Here are the top ten reasons why we should continue the conversation about using nanotechnology in food. Each point on the list is illustrated with at least one example the experts found to be especially useful or promising. Though several innovations on the list are still cooking on the proverbial laboratory backburner and may not be in the food production web for a few more years, others are being served up right now.

1. CONTAMINATION SENSOR
A University of Rochester Medical Center team has given quality assurance staff a way to immediately detect E. coli bacteria in a food sample by using a digital camera and a laser. The team’s research measuring and detecting light scattering by cell mitochondria evolved toward development of a system detecting light scattering in the presence of E. coli bacteria. A protein of the bacterium set on a silicon chip binds with any other E. coli bacteria present in the food sample. This binding results in a nano-sized light scattering detectable by analysis of digital images. A biosensor developed by an Agricultural Research Service scientist in Athens, Georgia, and his university colleagues uses fluorescent dye particles attached to bacteria antibodies. If Salmonella bacteria are present in the food being tested, the nano-sized dye particles become visible. No need to send out to the lab and wait days for culturing results with these two examples of instantaneous sensors.

2. ANTIMICROBIAL PACKAGING
Foods such as cheese, sliced meat and bakery that are prone to spoiling on the surface have been the focus for contact packaging imbued with antimicrobials. Spanish researchers and the manufacturer Artibal SA have brought to market a food film for bakery products that incorporates the essential oil of cinnamon. Working with oregano oil and apple puree, scientists for the USDA Agricultural Research Service have created edible food films that are able to kill certain E. coli. Britain’s University of Leeds is testing packaging made with nano particles of zinc, calcium, magnesium oxide and titanium dioxide — materials that are more cheaply sourced than nano silver, the now-controversial forerunner for antimicrobial packaging and food storage boxes.

3. IMPROVED FOOD STORAGE
Nanoclays embedded in plastic bottles and nylon food films stiffen packaging and reduce gas permeability. The nano-enhanced barrier keeps oxygen-sensitive foods fresher and can reduce packaging costs for manufacturers. Bayer Polymers has created a low cost nanoclay composite interior coating for paperboard cartons to keep juice fresher. And are you ready for beer in plastic bottles? Nanocomposites such as Nanocor’s Imperm or Honeywell’s Aegis OX with oxygen radical scavenging ability give plastic bottle manufacturers a 6-month shelf life for their beer.

4. ENHANCED NUTRIENT DELIVERY
Nano-encapsulating takes the process of micro encapsulation, a means for drug delivery pioneered by the pharmaceutical industry, and improves solubility of vitamins, antioxidants, healthy omega oil fractions and other nutrients. Israel’s NutraLease won a Food Expo Innovation Award last year from the IFT for their process. Nano-nutrient particles are fully soluble and invisible in water and oil, widening the door for potential nutraceutical beverages.

5. GREEN PACKAGING
Biodegradable bioplastics, usually made from plant-based materials, have become a big research focus for nanotechnology these days. Plantic, a company in Australia, manufactures their packaging from the starch of organic, non genetically modified corn. Using chitin, the main component of lobster shells, Jochen Weiss at the University of Hohenheim in Germany and Jose Maria Lagaron of the Agrochemistry and Food Technology Institute in Spain are just two of many materials scientists world wide who work with the electrospinning of this natural polymer. Chitosan is dissolved in solvent and the solution drawn through a tiny hole with applied electricity, a long, nano-slim fiber spins out from the hole. These strong and naturally antimicrobial nano fibers from a sustainable source can be developed into green food packaging.

6. PESTICIDE REDUCTION
A Cornell University team headed by textile scientist Margaret Frey developed a cloth farmers can use to reduce the amount of crop agrichemicals. Planted along with seeds, the cloth’s saturated nano fibers slowly release pesticides and herbicides so that additional spraying of crops becomes unnecessary. The targeted release also eliminates chemical leaching into the water supply to benefit both consumers and the environment.

7. TRACKING, TRACING; BRAND PROTECTION
California’s Oxonica makes Nanobarcodes from nano-particles that contain silver and gold stripes varying in width, length and amount, such that billions of combinations can be created to tag individual products. The barcodes have been primarily used to assure brand and authenticity in pharmaceuticals, but applications could be forthcoming in tracing food batches. Combined with pathogen sensors, the barcodes that must be read by modified microscopes could trace sources of outbreak.

8. TEXTURE
Scaling down the size of food molecules to nano-sized crystals creates more particles for an overall greater surface area. Wageningen University in central Holland has developed water-in-oil-in-water emulsions of nano-sized lipids. Food technologists say food spreadability and stability improve as a result of incorporating these multiple emulsions, as they’re called. For example a low-fat mayonnaise formulation provides a satisfying fatty mouth feel, tasters said, such that extra stabilizers and thickeners aren’t needed to achieve the desirable texture. The nano-emulsion could have its application in formulating other low-fat products.

9. FLAVOR
San Diego-based Senomyx has created novel flavors such as cold and creamy based on a rethinking of how taste buds perceive flavor. Using nanoscale assays, researchers have identified which individual cells on a given taste bud perceive a flavor. Each cell would recognize just one of the five main flavors — bitter, salty, sweet, sour and umami. Working within this conceptualization, the company has developed a library of flavors, including compounds called bitter blockers. These specialized molecules trick the tongue into not tasting the bitterness naturally inherent in foods such as cocoa or soy. These bitter blockers as well as Senomyx’s sweet and salty enhancers have already gotten the nod of approval from food giants such as Nestle and Coca Cola who are responding to consumer desires for packaged foods and beverages formulated with less salt and sugar.

10. BACTERIA IDENTIFICATION AND ELIMINATION
Researchers at Clemson University in South Carolina have developed a chicken feed to remove campylobacter, a bacteria common and benign in poultry that provokes cramps and diarrhea in people ingesting the contaminated, undercooked meat. The feed enriched by nano carbohydrate particles binds with the bacterium’s surface to remove it through the bird’s feces. These nano particles might one day be combined with sensors in order to identify and remove other bacteria. Eventually, researchers say, these antibiotic-functioning nanoparticles might even be applied to targeting and treating bacterial disease in humans. But for now, use in chickens might reduce the one million annual outbreaks of campylobacteriosis in Americans.

Related Images:

Food Packaging Using Nanotechnology Methods: an Overview of

Food Packaging Using Nanotechnology Methods: an Overview of ‘Smart Packaging’ and ‘Active Packaging’

(The Demonic Criminals Get “us” to believe that these things are good for us, later we found it being used for mind control.)

Using Clay Nanoparticles to Improve Plastic Packaging for Food Products

How Creating a Molecular Barrier by Embedding Nanocrystals in Plastic Can Improve Packaging

Using Nanotechnology Methods to Develop Antimicrobial Packaging and ‘Active Packaging’

Embedded Sensors in Food Packaging and ‘Electronic Tongue’ Technology
Using a Nanotech Bioswitch in ‘Release on Command’ Food Packaging

Using Food Packaging Sensors in Defence and Security Applications

Problems in Industrial Food Production that Sensors and ‘Smart Packaging’ Will Not Address
Background

Today, food packaging and monitoring are a major focus of food industry-related nanotech R&D. Packaging that incorporates nanomaterials can be “smart,” which means that it can respond to environmental conditions or repair itself or alert a consumer to contamination and/or the presence of pathogens. According to industry analysts, the current US market for “active, controlled and smart” packaging for foods and beverages is an estimated $38 billion – and will surpass $54 billion by 2008. The following examples illustrate nanoscale applications for food & beverage packaging.
Using Clay Nanoparticles to Improve Plastic Packaging for Food Products

Chemical giant Bayer produces a transparent plastic film (called Durethan) containing nanoparticles of clay. The nanoparticles are dispersed throughout the plastic and are able to block oxygen, carbon dioxide and moisture from reaching fresh meats or other foods. The nanoclay also makes the plastic lighter, stronger and more heat-resistant.
How Creating a Molecular Barrier by Embedding Nanocrystals in Plastic Can Improve Packaging

Until recently, industry’s quest to package beer in plastic bottles (for cheaper transport) was unsuccessful because of spoilage and flavour problems. Today, Nanocor, a subsidiary of Amcol International Corp., is producing nanocomposites for use in plastic beer bottles that give the brew a six-month shelf-life. By embedding nanocrystals in plastic, researchers have created a molecular barrier that helps prevent the escape of oxygen. Nanocor and Southern Clay Products are now working on a plastic beer bottle that may increase shelf-life to 18 months.
Using Nanotechnology Methods to Develop Antimicrobial Packaging and ‘Active Packaging’

Kodak, best known for producing camera film, is using nanotech to develop antimicrobial packaging for food products that will be commercially available in 2005. Kodak is also developing other ‘active packaging,’ which absorbs oxygen, thereby keeping food fresh.
Embedded Sensors in Food Packaging and ‘Electronic Tongue’ Technology

Scientists at Kraft, as well as at Rutgers University and the University of Connecticut, are working on nano-particle films and other packaging with embedded sensors that will detect food pathogens. Called “electronic tongue” technology, the sensors can detect substances in parts per trillion and would trigger a colour change in the packaging to alert the consumer if a food has become contaminated or if it has begun to spoil.
Using a Nanotech Bioswitch in ‘Release on Command’ Food Packaging

Researchers in the Netherlands are going one further to develop intelligent packaging that will release a preservative if the food within begins to spoil. This “release on command” preservative packaging is operated by means of a bioswitch developed through nanotechnology.
Using Food Packaging Sensors in Defence and Security Applications

Developing small sensors to detect food-borne pathogens will not just extend the reach of industrial agriculture and large-scale food processing. In the view of the US military, it’s a national security priority. With present technologies, testing for microbial food-contamination takes two to seven days and the sensors that have been developed to date are too big to be transported easily. Several groups of researchers in the US are developing biosensors that can detect pathogens quickly and easily, reasoning that “super sensors” would play a crucial role in the event of a terrorist attack on the food supply. With USDA and National Science Foundation funding, researchers at Purdue University are working to produce a hand-held sensor capable of detecting a specific bacteria instantaneously from any sample. They’ve created a start-up company called BioVitesse.
Problems in Industrial Food Production that Sensors and ‘Smart Packaging’ Will Not Address

While devices capable of detecting food-borne pathogens could be useful in monitoring the food supply, sensors and ‘smart packaging’ will not address the root problems inherent in industrial food production that result in contaminated foods: faster meat (dis)assembly lines, increased mechanisation, a shrinking labour force of low-wage workers, fewer inspectors, the lack of corporate and government accountability and the great distances between food producers, processors and consumers. Just as it has become the consumer’s responsibility to make sure meat has been cooked long enough to ensure that pathogens have been killed, consumers will soon be expected to act as their own meat inspectors so that industry can continue to trim safety overhead costs and increase profits.

Source: ‘Down on the Farm: the Impact of Nano-Scale Technologies on Food and Agriculture’, ETC Group Report, November 2004.

For more information on this source please visit the ETC Group.

Date Added: Jul 25, 2005

Related Images: