{"id":885,"date":"2011-12-07T19:40:26","date_gmt":"2011-12-07T23:40:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/govsponsoredstalking.info\/?p=885"},"modified":"2011-12-07T19:42:25","modified_gmt":"2011-12-07T23:42:25","slug":"electronic-warfare-satellite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/govsponsoredstalking.info\/?p=885","title":{"rendered":"Electronic Warfare Satellite"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Electronic
\nHigh-Power Microwaves \u2013 \u201c\u2026The peculiar thing about space warfare is that many of the innovations that sound the most far-fetched \u2014 like illuminating a battlefield at night with light that only one side can see or the deployment of high-power microwave pills \u2014 are actually much closer to existence, technologically, than some items that might seem more logically in line for development. Consider the spaceplane. It would be a tremendous tool for the military, since it could get to any point on the globe in a few hours. But building a manned craft that can quickly glide in and out of low orbits has proved incredibly daunting. Earlier this year, the X-33, NASA\u2019s big experiment in flying into space, ended in failure. The image that most people have of \u201cStar Wars\u201d-style combat \u2014 manned spaceplanes engaging in dogfights near the moon \u2014 is very far off. But the use of space for weaponry directed back at earth or guided from space is pretty much at hand. \u201cI\u2019m particularly excited about high-power microwaves,\u201d Beason tells me. Lacking the thousand-mile reach of lasers, H.P.M.\u2019s, as they are called, can be projected only about a half-mile. But were an unmanned plane guided from space able to transport a high-powered microwave device close to a battlefield, the possibilities could push the Pentagon\u2019s bomb-to-target ratio even closer to perfection. To an invading army of modern soldiers, a massive hit by high-powered microwave could ground their high-tech weapons, leaving them to wage modern warfare with their fists. The time lag between the current R.&D. on microwaves and its application in the battlefield may be a while. Beason himself estimates 15 years, although one use is on the verge of showing up in battlefields soon. On the ground, a microwave weapon could be used to drive back an invading squadron. \u201cIt\u2019ll feel like opening the door of an oven,\u201d Beason says. \u201cWe\u2019re testing it on humans now.\u201d He pauses and worries that he is bumping up against classified information. \u201cIf you want to know more,\u201d he adds, \u201cyou\u2019ll have to contact the Human Effectiveness Directorate\u2026\u201d (The next battlefield may be in Outer Space)<\/p>\n

Domestic Intelligence Network \u2013 \u201c\u2026It just gets scarier. The Black Ops that Mr. Tice was involved in related to electronic intelligence gathering via space systems communications, non-communications signals, electronic warfare, satellite control, telemetry, sensors, and special capability systems.For greater insight as to the impact of these programs readers should review decades old FOIA authenticated programs such as MKULTRA, BLUEBIRD, COINTELPRO and ARTICHOKE. Radar based Telemetry involves the ability to see through walls without thermal imaging. Electronic Warfare is even scarier if we take a look at the science. NSA Signals Intelligence Use of EMF Brain Stimulation. NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF Brain Stimulation has been in development since the MKUltra program of the early 1950\u2032s, which included neurological research into \u201cradiation\u201d (non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development. The resulting secret technology is categorized at the National Security Archives as \u201cRadiation Intelligence,\u201d defined as \u201cinformation from unintentionally emanated electromagnetic waves in the environment, not including radioactivity or nuclear detonation.\u201d Signals Intelligence implemented and kept this technology secret in the same manner as other electronic warfare programs of the U.S. government. The NSA monitors available information about this technology and withholds scientific research from the public. There are also international intelligence agency agreements to keep this technology secret. The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyzes electrical activity in humans from a distance. NSA computer-generated brain mapping can continuously monitor all the electrical activity in the brain continuously. The NSA records and decodes individual brain maps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for national security purposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by the military for Brain-to-computer link (In military fighter aircraft, for example). For electronic surveillance purposes electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject\u2019s verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain\u2019s auditory cortex thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia. Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject\u2019s brain and show images from the subject\u2019s brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject\u2019s eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to the visual cortex. bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject\u2019s brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes. Individual citizens occasionally targeted for surveillance by independently operating NSA personnel NSA personnel can control the lives of hundreds of thousands of individuals in the U.S. by using the NSA\u2019s domestic intelligence network and cover businesses. The operations independently run by them can sometimes go beyond the bounds of law. Long-term control and sabotage of tens of thousands of unwitting citizens by NSA operatives is likely to happen. NSA Domint has the ability to covertly assassinate U.S. citizens or run covert psychological control operations to cause subjects to be diagnosed with ill mental health. National Security Agency Signals Intelligence Electronic Brain Link Technology NSA SigInt can remotely detect, identify and monitor a person\u2019s bioelectric fields\u2026\u201d (Is the NSA Conducting Electronic Warfare On Americans?)<\/p>\n

Space warfare is combat that takes place in outer space, i.e. outside the atmosphere. Space warfare therefore includes ground-to-space warfare, such as attacking satellites from the Earth, as well as space-to-space warfare, such as satellites attacking satellites. It does not include the use of satellites for espionage, surveillance, or military communications, however useful those activities might be. It does not technically include space-to-ground warfare, where orbital objects attack ground, sea or air targets directly, but the public and media frequently use the term to include any conflict which includes space as a theater of operations, regardless of the intended target. For example, a rapid delivery system in which troops are deployed from orbit might be described as \u201cspace warfare,\u201d even though the military uses the term as described above. A film was produced by the U.S. Military in the early 1960s called Space and National Security which depicted space warfare. From 1985 to 2002 there was a United States Space Command, which in 2002 merged with the United States Strategic Command. There is a Russian Space Force, which was established on August 10, 1992, and which became an independent section of the Russian military on June 1, 2001. Only a few incidents of space warfare have occurred in world history, and all were training missions, as opposed to actions against real opposing forces. In the mid-1980s a USAF pilot in an F-15 successfully shot down the P78-1, a communications satellite in a 345 mile (555 km) orbit. In 2007 the People\u2019s Republic of China used a missile system to destroy one of its obsolete satellites (see 2007 Chinese anti-satellite missile test), and in 2008 the United States similarly destroyed its malfunctioning satellite USA 193. To date, there have been no human casualties resulting from conflict in space, nor has any ground target been successfully neutralized from orbit. International treaties governing space limit or regulate conflicts in space and limit the installation of weapon systems, especially nuclear weapons\u2026Directed-Energy Weapons \u2013 A USAF Boeing YAL-1 airborne laser.Weapon systems that fall under this category include lasers, linear particle accelerators or particle-beam based weaponry, microwaves and plasma-based weaponry. Particle beams involve the acceleration of charged or neutral particles in a stream towards a target at extremely high velocities, the impact of which creates a reaction causing immense damage. Most of these weapons are theoretical or impractical to implement currently, aside from lasers which are starting to be used in terrestrial warfare. That said, directed-energy weapons are more practical and more effective in a vacuum (i.e. space) than in the Earth\u2019s atmosphere, as in the atmosphere the particles of air interfere with and disperse the directed energy. Obviously, that problem would not occur in space. (Wikepedia)<\/p>\n

YouTube videos link:
\nNo Navy base In Peaceful Island, Jeju .mp4<\/p>\n