Can interpret behavior and identify potential threats – “…The Visual Intelligence Grounded in Learning (VIGIL) project is part of the larger DARPA program known as Mind’s Eye, which is to develop a smart camera system that needs minimal human supervision, can be deployed rapidly and cost effectively in unmanned vehicles (UVs) stationed in areas under automatic surveillance, and can interpret behavior and identify potential threats from video data. “Surveillance in dangerous areas is currently performed by remote reconnaissance teams and advanced scouting patrols, who are often risking their lives,” said Hung Bui, SRI’s senior computer scientist. “While their efforts can be supplemented through the use of cameras on unmanned vehicles, such devices still require constant human monitoring to analyze ongoing activities. SRI’s VIGIL system combines automatic reasoning and machine perception to automatically analyze areas of interest while keeping members of the armed forces out of harm’s way…” (DARPA Picks Visual Intelligence System’s Design Leader)

Advanced human-computer Interaction – “…Lockheed said that analysts go through volumes of disparate ISR data from sea, air, and land assets to produce an integrated view of critical information for the warfighter. It is difficult for analysts to easily share and integrate that data. The creation of the new InsightOS will enable automated combining of sensor and intelligence data from multiple assets, dynamically re-tasking assets as necessary, and incorporating analysts into the process via advanced Human-Computer Interaction tools. As a result, the fidelity and speed of battlefield analyses will improve, increasing mission success and warfighter safety. Based in Bethesda, Maryland, Lockheed Martin is a global security company that is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services…” (Lockheed to Help Analyze Data)

Neuro-optical system – “…Awarded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Cognitive Technology Threat Warning System program, or CT2WS, is part of the U.S. Department of Defense’s effort to address a key mission need and represents a significant leap forward in technology from that available today. The goal of the CT2WS program is to drive a breakthrough in soldier-portable visual threat warning devices. Once successfully developed, the intelligent neuro-optical system will provide the warfighter with an unprecedented capability to detect targets of interest at an extremely long range over a wide field of view. In Phase One of the program, the Northrop Grumman team plans to demonstrate the concept by building a breadboard system and complete a preliminary design for the company’s Human-aided Optical Recognition/Notification of Elusive Threats (HORNET) system. HORNET will utilize a custom helmet equipped with electro-encephalogram electrodes placed on the scalp to record the user’s continuous electrical brain activity. The operator’s neural responses to the presence or absence of potential threats will train the system’s algorithms, which will continue to be refined over time so that the warfighter is always presented with items of relevance to his mission. “Northrop Grumman’s HORNET system leverages the latest advances in real-time coupling of human brain activity with automated cognitive neural processing to provide superior target detection,” says Michael House, Northrop Grumman’s CT2WS program manager. “The system will maintain persistent surveillance in order to defeat an enemy’s attempts to surprise through evasive move-stop-move tactics, giving the U.S. warfighter as much as a 20-minute advantage over his adversaries…” (Northrop Grumman-Led Team Awarded Contract to Develop Electronic Bi…)

Microchip in the brain – “…The arm, which was developed at a cost of over $100 million by DARPA and Johns Hopkins University over the past five years, is controlled by a microchip in the brain. The microchip records neuron activity and decodes the signals to activate motor neurons that control the prosthetic. DARPA’s prosthetic works much like a regular arm, with the ability to bend, rotate, and twist in 27 different ways. It is designed to restore almost complete hand and finger function to patients dealing with spinal cord injury, stroke, or amputation. Now that the arm has been expedited through the FDA’s program, Johns Hopkins will implant its microchips in five patients and monitor them for a year. There are few safety concerns, but the university anticipates issues with maintaining chip quality over time, according to the a href=”http://articles.latimes.com/2011/feb/09/nation/la-na-prosthetic-arm…″ target=”_blank”>Los Angeles Times. If all goes well, the arm could be on the market in just four to five years…” (DARPA’s Mind-Controlled Prosthetic Arm Could Be on the Market in Fo…)

Electrical current to the brain – “…Applying electricity to the brain has a long and at times dark history. Doctors, psychiatrists and other researchers have known for hundreds of years that applying electrical current to the brain can cause changes; some good, some not so much. Electrical stimulation has been used to keep executed prisoners from twitching after death, to “help” patients overcome depression and more recently to help people with injuries or brain impairments to regain functionality. This history now colors any new research as fear and skepticism tend to get in the way of serious work. This is likely the reason that this new research is being done by DARPA, rather than an independent organization; it doesn’t have to answer to anyone except the DoD. Because the amount of current is so small, volunteers report no pain, just a slight tingling sensation during the procedure, and afterwards can offer no real explanations as to why they performed better than they might have otherwise. This research, and other studies like it, have set off both alarms and intrigue in certain quarters. Some worry people, such as college students will jump on the procedure as a means to help cram for exams, others wonder if electronic devices such as blue-tooth phones are emitting electricity that might help them learn; while others yet point out, very soberly, that no one really knows just yet what long-term effects people might have from exposure to something as simple as tCDS…” (DARPA takes new look at electrical brain stimulation to aid in lear…)

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is an agency of the United States Department of Defense responsible for the development of new technology for use by the military. DARPA has been responsible for funding the development of many technologies which have had a major effect on the world, including computer networking, as well as NLS, which was both the first hypertext system, and an important precursor to the contemporary ubiquitous graphical user interface. Its original name was simply Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), but it was renamed to “DARPA” (for Defense) in March 1972, then renamed “ARPA” again in February 1993, and then renamed “DARPA” again in March 1996. DARPA was established during 1958 (as ARPA) in response to the Soviet launching of Sputnik during 1957, with the mission of keeping U.S. military technology more sophisticated than that of the nation’s potential enemies. From DARPA’s own introduction, DARPA’s original mission, established in 1958, was to prevent technological surprise like the launch of Sputnik, which signaled that the Soviets had beaten the U.S. into space. The mission statement has evolved over time. Today, DARPA’s mission is still to prevent technological surprise to the US, but also to create technological surprise for its enemies. DARPA is independent from other more conventional military R&D and reports directly to senior Department of Defense management. DARPA has around 240 personnel (about 140 technical) directly managing a $3.2 billion budget. These figures are “on average” since DARPA focuses on short-term (two to four-year) projects run by small, purpose-built teams. (Wikepedia)

YouTube videos link:

Project GreenVax

http://youtu.be/T0nukOKUiCo

DARPA Nano Air Vehicle (NAV) program

http://youtu.be/NuD1WKHsggs

The DARPA Autonomous Robotic Manipulation (ARM) program

http://youtu.be/d4rCvoX34Ew

DARPA Video and Image Retrieval and Analysis Tool (VIRAT)

http://youtu.be/LkueCrzzRrk

HAARP

http://youtu.be/MnRPZOUVhJ4

RELATED READING:

• Official Web-site: DARPA
• New DARPA tech can scan eyes in a moving crowd
• Augmented cognition: Science fact or science fiction?
• Spies, military looking for hacker-, backdoor-proof circuits
• General Atomics wins $40M to scale military laser
• Broad Operational Language Translation (BOLT)
• DARPA Joins Blue Energy and World Energy in Race to Harness Ocean P…
• DARPA To Invest $1 Billion In Defense Manufacturing
• Surveillance Dust (Presentation)
• Global Network 19th Annual Conference Joint Declaration

Related Images:

Artificial Intelligence and European project FACETS (the fast analog computer)
Artificial Intelligence and European project FACETS (the analog computer) provides new medical imaging technique for the brain and the possibility of “reverse engineering the brain”

The government lacks a regulator who can ensure that the laws for ethical review and informed consent for research on humans with brain implants followed. The shortage means that the Government neither can satisfy the requirements of the conventions on human rights and bioethics incumbent government, a precarious situation for European citizens.Graduate Abuse can happen completely without insight with brain-machine interface and e-science.
When science produces results that are changing the neurobiological description of human consciousness, what is left of the notions that humans have free will and personal responsibility for their actions? New knowledge about the neural basis of morality is blowing also renewed debate about the existence of a universal morality. These questions are discussed within the field of neuroethics, a subject that deals with the philosophical and ethical issues raised by neuroscience and cognitive research. (Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics )

Scientists have the knowledge of the fMRI and PET cameras, among other things learned where in the brain electrodes must be placed to the E-science visualization of human perception.

In recent decades meetings between nanotechnology, information technology, biotechnology and neuroscience have produced a new research area, which is developing new, unknown products and services. We are facing a new revolution, which is already running with the launch of mind characterized universal computer. A unique perceptual tool, not only raise awareness for our minds but also imitate them: sight, hearing, taste, smell and touch.

CNN UN stands for Cellular Neural / Non-linear Network – Universal Machine. And there are three innovators Tamás Rosk, Leon Chua, and Angel Rodriguez Vazques, who are the pioneers behind the “revolution of the senses”. They have introduced a new computer policy, which differs from the digital model magazine sparkling, lower standards.

We’ve said ‘yes’ without any major protests to the electronic age “first wave”. When we are referring to the cheap chip that made ​​the PC to every man’s tools.
“The second wave” came creeping – also without objection. A series of inexpensive electronic means such as lasers, the Internet was built for broadband and mobile phone, which is now self-evident part of our everyday lives.
In the “third wave”, it also applies connections to the brain, called brain-computer integration (brain-Macine interface) and related network-based human-machine language. This means both huge benefits but also disadvantages to humans. The disadvantages include complex legal implications, concerning the identity and integrity.

Info-Bionic challenging society. In the biological field, we first familiarize ourselves with “smart” devices and tools, which stimulates and motivates the human central nervous system. But it also outlines smart prostheses implanted in the living organism. The direct contact between these “smart” nano-implants and our central nervous system, pointing towards a symbiosis (living together), between brain and computer. This new realm, which is named for info-bionic, challenge course, the traditional values ​​of society and its ethical standards.

Computer scientists also predicts that within the next few years neural interfaces will be designed so that it will not only increase the dynamic range of the senses, but will also enhance memory and enable “cyberthink” that invisible communication built on ideas.

Direct connection to the brain: It is without doubt the most complicated task. Here are dangers as great as the opportunities. This is also bioethics responsibility far greater than in those areas, which so far we have touched. But really, all mined areas and the limitation of the commercial profit hunger is therefore highly desirable.

Future Technologies, Future and Emerging Technologies – FET. The basis for this strategy is the focus on the future of Information and Communication Technology – ICT

Here are some quotes from the EU’s 7th Framework Programme.
“Can one example understand and exploit the ways in which social and biological systems organize themselves and evolve, will pave the way for the development of new opportunities for next-generation software and network technologies. “
“The understanding of how the human brain works not only leads to innovations in medicine, but it also creates new models for energy, fault-tolerant and adaptive computer technology.”
“FET support example, been crucial for research in quantum information technology in Europe. This technique promises an enormous computing power far beyond the capacity of ordinary computers, and also completely secure communications. By early investments have FET program made ​​a decisive contribution to Europe now is a world leader in the field. “
“In the FET area carries, in addition, pioneering work on new ideas as artificial living cells, synthetic biology, chemical communication, collective intelligence and two-way interface between brain and machine.”

Research Council has published a booklet packed facts pocket “where gold glitters blue” on the new nanoscience. This new technology opens up tremendous opportunities, but also contains a number of ethical issues. Sweden currently lacks clear ethical guidelines.

Here are quotes from the book written by Ulf Görman, professor of ethics and religious studies at Lund University.
Nanoelectronics! A number of ethical declarations have been introduced to prevent abuse of people, including the Declaration of Helsinki. In 1997, also signed the EU Member States’ Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine “in the Spanish city of Oviedo.
-These declarations have been added in response to the abuse of people who were in World War II. Oviedo Convention and other European rules have resulted in new legislation in Sweden. For example, the Privacy Act, which came into force in 1998, and the Act on Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans, which came into force in 2004. Ulf Görman believe that when we do a retrospective, it is easy for us to distinguish between unethical and ethical good research.

Now we open the doors to an unknown area where we do not know how to apply ethics.What should it be and what should not be allowed when you can make the electrode implant that can both influence and learn of the brain? He takes up the example of studying learning and memory. ”Micro Implants can provide unprecedented opportunities to understand how we learn and remember things, and hence why we forget and find it difficult to learn. While it may be perceived as a form of abuse that like that look in our most private mental world “.

Thought Control – a new ethical problem. Being able to connect the human brain to a computer via electrodes open, of course, frightening possibilities. Will it be feasible to control a person’s thoughts?
There are important ethical aspects of this. One could of course theoretically able to control brain functions and modify people’s personality. For example, making them more or less prone to aggression or to increase learning ability by adding the chronic stimulation. It’s like with everything else, in that the knowledge is there, you can use it in many ways. Ulf Görman

Swedish and EU researchers possess, in secret, a privilege of the commercial profit hunger to develop these advanced technologies. Researchers may, without obtaining the informed consent and without the approval of an ethics board inject nanotechnology and research on humans, completely “Top Secret”. This is the way to the products, software and network technology is approaching patent application and a commercial launch of the research results, is on its way.

Research where informed consent could not be obtained and an approval of an ethics board would not be due to the physical and psychological risks for the individual is totally unknown, will not stop Swedish an EU researchers.

Withholding research reports on the development of new technologies means that the existing diagnosis in psychiatry and the judicial system disposes of the victims of abuse research, which makes these instances of “missing traders” for the illegal research. In this way, researchers will escape detection, and no responsibility. In nanotechnology and human-machine integration is the market and the power that controls, not ethics.

Because of that situation, people are slaughtered with impunity as research objects with the new technologies. When the legislative and diagnostics are missing, the computer-brain integration, it follows that attempts objects during research time exposed to serious torture.Graduate abuses have naturally resulted in the subjects in pure frustration committed ensanity acts and ended up in prison or in psychiatric care. Had the law existed and functioned, this research instead to point out that scientists are forced to drive people “across the border” and charged to the judiciary and mental health.

Although concrete evidence because of evaded research reports are currently lacking, so will future research and patents, of course, be able to uncover this hidden aggravated criminal research.

When the government knowingly or unknowingly withholds itself from scientific information will result in a right wrecked Sweden.
People can during the long development of the computer brains of the Internet-based human-machine language is not heard. This leads to pure execution is under development to cover up the criminal teknologys rampage.

How much longer must people illegally injected at the Swedish hospital?
How much longer must people’s brains are allowed to “cut” for the enslavement of the scientists’ services without compensation?
How much longer must people assaulted, death and / or misdiagnosed before the government makes sure to meet the conventions on human rights and bioethics?
Who takes responsibility for the children that are left homeless when the researchers injected and linked up attempts of people who have family, social welfare and labor?
How many people have died earlier in scientific experiments because of lack of transparency in the Swedish neuroscience hunt for power and money?
How many ensanity acts, traffic accidents, deaths in maternity hospitals, and even political murder has been diagnosed, but no account is taken of nanotechnology and the many years of development of technologies for computer-brain integration and the study of human behavior?

Five years of direct connectivity of the brain, the pattern recognition of brain neurons to cognitive behavior (perception), designed with artificial intelligence in a multimedia connection between brain implant and computers.

Related Images:

Rogue stalkers entering homes in the middle of the night, dentists, and doctors, each abusing human rights by covertly implanting microchips into the brains of unwitting children and adults may soon find their job easier since École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Laboratory of Nanoscale Electronics and Structures (LANES) scientists have made the first molybdenite microchip, using smaller and more energy efficient transistors. Kurzweil Accelerating Intelligence News reports Molybdenite can surpass silicon in terms of miniaturization, electricity consumption, and mechanical flexibility, scientists say.

“We have built an initial prototype, putting from two to six serial transistors in place, and shown that basic binary logic operations were possible, which proves that we can make a larger chip,” said LANES director Andras Kis.

“The main advantage of MoS2 is that it allows us to reduce the size of transistors, and thus to further miniaturize them,” explained Kis.

“They can be turned on and off much more quickly, and can be put into a more complete standby mode.”

These could be used for the new roll-up type computers or devices “affixed to the skin.”

On December 6, 2000, Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD, Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland, published an article, “Microchip Implants, Mind Control, and Cybernetics,” one of the first concise papers on the history of secretly forced brain implants.

In August, IBM announced it had developed silicon microchips that mimic the brain and “rewire” themselves in response to new information according to The Telegraph. “The technology has been hailed as a move towards ‘cognitive computing’, allowing machines to perform human-like functions such as recognition and learning.”

An untold number of self-identified innocent Targeted Individuals allege having been unwittingly micro-chipped, without their knowledge or consent, a claim private investigator William Taylor says is not far-fetched.

Taylor’s investigations evidence that at least ten percent of his Targeted Individual cases have been covertly implanted with microchips that remotely work two ways: to emit and receive at the whim of the controller.

Although few American doctors, psychologists and psychiatrists will admit high-tech electronic abuse some of their patients report, the history of secretly forced brain implants plus existing mounting evidence of an increasing numbers of innocent citizens are being secretly brain implanted with U.S. RFID chips without their knowledge or consent.

While most brain implant reports only highlight the a positive side of the devices, implanted subjects are then vulnerable to remotelt applied no-touch torture, mind control plus non-consensual human experimentation.

Suggested by the author:

Secretly forced brain implants: A brief history
Secretly forced brain implants Pt 1: Explosive court case
Secretly forced brain implant Pt II: MRI scan image and reports of Target, James Walbert
Part III Secretly forced brain implants: Ex-SS FBI agent defends chipped targets
Secretly forced brain implants Pt IV: Intel expert on the doctors, children, military research

Related Images:

Spiral Waves – Most targeted individuals will discover the visible spiral waves particles while being attack by directed energy weapons. These electromagnetic radiations attacks the body specifically the head, eyes, nose, ears, mouth, chest, legs, stomach and genital areas. A scientific explanations of these phenomena are confirmed in an article from globalsecurity.org and it also explained the attacks are being done wherever the targets are located whether he or she is anywhere on land, inside an airplane, or on board in seaship. The article read: “…Radar tracking and imaging systems use dedicated transmitters to generate electromagnetic radiation to form non-literal images of satellites. Since the system is an active sensor and thus provides its own source of illumination, it is useful at any time of the day and under almost all weather conditions to provide high-volume means of tracking space objects. Because of these facts, radar systems are, in general, more frequently available than visible systems. However, they are most commonly used to provide highly accurate tracking information on spacecraft in low Earth orbit (LEO), typically at an altitude less than 3,000 km, and, due to high cost for the necessary power, are not used to track geosynchronous satellites…Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) tracking and identification involves the collection and analysis of electronic signals for intelligence purposes. Typical targets for SIGINT collection include space system components that emit electromagnetic waves; either uplink, downlink, or crosslink transmitters. The basic capability to collect communications signals from satellites requires little more equipment than what is used by many home satellite television subscribers. Passive RF tracking involves the use of antennas on the ground to gather tracking information to precisely locate the source of a satellite’s signal. Because electromagnetic waves from a satellite’s transmitter travel in a straight line, the direction of arrival of the signal is the direction of the transmitter. Directional bearing information on a particular radiator can determine the location of that radiator. Data, from one of the sources discussed in the previous sections, on the location of a satellite can be used as a source for the initial satellite tracking information….” (Threats to United States Space Capabilities)

COIL lasers with power outputs – In this site, targeting weapons, COIL Lasers, are briefly described and commercially available: “DEW research has been carried out in the Russian Federation since the early 1960s, particularly with lasers. Both nuclear and solid propellant generators have developed several MW power levels, and there were several joint programmes with the US in the 1990s using Russian power generation systems. A major test facility was located at Sary Shagan in Kazakhstan. Russian programmes have been reported for ground-based, airborne and space-based laser weapons. It has been reported that a tracked and armoured vehicle with a ground-based laser was developed in the mid-1980s for use against aircraft and missile targets, but these have not been displayed. It has also been reported that the Russians conducted tests using a ground-based laser to disable sensors carried on satellites in low earth orbit. Several Russian companies have reported developing COIL lasers with power outputs in the 15 kW range, and in December 2005 there was a proposal for a truck mounted ground-based laser weapon system with a power of 30 kW and a 5 km range. It is believed that the Russians have allocated more funding to DEW research and development programmes in 2008, following the US destruction of a satellite with a SM-3 interceptor in February 2008. A Russian report stated that an airborne laser has been fitted to an Il-76 aircraft, and was tested in 2010. This was tested against ground and airborne sensors, and could be tested against satellites in low earth orbit in the future…” (Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) (Russian Federation), Defensive weapons)

Directed Energy Weapons – In the Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada web-site, targeting weapons are briefly discussed:”…These are weapons that can destroy electronic circuitry by the creation or emission of electromagnetic pulse (EMP) or radiation. A nuclear explosion creates both and can effectively neutralize satellites, which have not been hardened against such effects. EMP lasts for a small fraction of a second but causes damage to unprotected circuitry within several hundred miles radius of the blast. Following a nuclear explosion, the resulting beta particles and gamma rays can also create havoc in space assets affecting both radio waves and radar waves. According to General Kenneth Hagemann, director of the Defence Nuclear Agency, a 50-kiloton nuclear weapon exploded at 62 miles above the earth would pump up the Van Allen radiation belt to the extent that increased exposure “would cause satellites to die in hours, days, or weeks”76. General Hagemann also points out that miniaturized electronics which make satellites lighter and smaller increases the vulnerability of satellites since they require less power and are consequently susceptible to smaller disruptions…Directed Energy Weapons “include laser, radio frequency” weapons. A laser weapon produces a concentrated beam, which can be projected from earth towards space assets. An example of such a system is the Mid-Infrared Advanced Chemical Laser (MIRACL). On October 17, 1997, the MIRACL laser successfully illuminated a satellite. Another program is the airborne laser (ABL) onboard a Boeing 747 aircraft. Laser weapons can be used to either physically harm the satellite or simply to” blind” the satellite sensors. Satellites in LEO are easier to target with earth-based lasers than those in geostationary orbit, which are much farther away…” (LOAC and the Neutralization of Satellites or IUS in Bello Satellitis)

Raytheon acquired key business assets of Ktech – “…Ktech’s expertise in directed energy and pulsed power make it a natural fit with Raytheon’s Advanced Security and Directed Energy Systems product line,” said Dr. Taylor W. Lawrence, Raytheon Missile Systems president. “Ktech brings world-class people, technology and strong relationships with the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories to Raytheon and its customers.” Ktech is a leader in pulsed power systems engineering. The company’s compact pulsed power systems, combined with its high efficiency magnetron technology, will enable increased integration of directed energy weapons on combat platforms. Ktech is also a leader in development of linear accelerator technology for government and commercial applications. The company brings its high power microwave, compact pulsed power system design, and RF and particle code simulation capabilities to Raytheon, as well as extensive experience in explosive pulsed power, diagnostics and effects testing…” (Raytheon Acquires Directed Energy Capabilities of Ktech Corporation)

The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) was proposed by U.S. President Ronald Reagan on March 23, 1983 to use ground and space-based systems to protect the United States from attack by strategic nuclear ballistic missiles. The initiative focused on strategic defense rather than the prior strategic offense doctrine of mutual assured destruction (MAD). The Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO) was set up in 1984 within the United States Department of Defense to oversee the Strategic Defense Initiative. The ambitious initiative was “widely criticized as being unrealistic, even unscientific” as well as for threatening to destabilize MAD and re-ignite “an offensive arms race”. It was soon derided as Star Wars, after the popular 1977 film by George Lucas. In 1987, the American Physical Society concluded that a global shield such as “Star Wars” was not only impossible with existing technology, but that ten more years of research was needed to learn whether it might ever be feasible. Under the administration of President Bill Clinton in 1993, its name was changed to the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO) and its emphasis was shifted from national missile defense to theater missile defense; and its scope from global to more regional coverage. It was never truly developed or deployed, though certain aspects of SDI research and technologies paved the way for some anti-ballistic missile systems of today. BMDO was renamed to the Missile Defense Agency in 2002. This article covers defense efforts under the SDIO. Space-related defense research and testing remains heavily-budgeted to this day, irrespective of the program names, operative/reporting organizations, politics, or reports to the contrary in the press. Although it is difficult to compile actual spending totals across the complete spectrum of space-based defense programs (including classified “off-budget” “black projects”), the U.S. has certainly invested well over $100 billion on “SDI” and follow-on programs, and holds a commanding lead over all current or potential future adversaries in the realm of space technology/warfare. Under the SDIO’s Innovative Sciences and Technology Office, headed by physicist and engineer James A. Ionson, PhD, the investment was predominantly made in basic research at national laboratories, universities, and in industry, and these programs have continued to be key sources of funding for top research scientists in the fields of high-energy physics, supercomputing/computation, advanced materials, and many other critical science and engineering disciplines: funding which indirectly supports other research work by top scientists, and which would be largely unavailable outside of the defense budget environment (Wikepedia).

Anti-satellite weapons (ASAT) are designed to incapacitate or destroy satellites for strategic military purposes. Currently, only the United States, the former USSR (now Russia) and the People’s Republic of China are known to have developed these weapons. On September 13, 1985, the United States destroyed US satellite P78-1 using an ASM-135 ASAT anti-satellite missile. On January 11, 2007, China destroyed an old Chinese orbiting weather satellite. A year and a month later, USA destroyed a malfunctioning US spy satellite USA-193 using a RIM-161 Standard Missile 3 on February 21, 2008 (Wikipedia).

YouTube videos link:

Satellite Lasers as Direct Energy Weapons

http://youtu.be/VB_bLJSRZ9A

Electronic Harassment by Directed Energy Weapons

http://youtu.be/I2HVhQYTRDE

Attacked by Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)

http://youtu.be/z_g9KgIukC4

Directed Energy Weapons 3

http://youtu.be/NYo54V3h8Hw

35folternachts32min(0108)teil2

http://youtu.be/3L6W6ajT6Lc

RELATED READING:

• History of ‘Directed Energy Weapons’
• High Energy Laser Directed Energy Weapons
• Threats to United States Space Capabilities
• Punching the U.S. Military’s “Soft Ribs” China’s Antisatellite Weap…
• Russian officer says developing new weapon for space defense
• Scientists at Porton Down researched comical non-lethal crowd contr…
• The Revolution in Military Affairs and Directed Energy Weapons
• Lethal Direct Energy Weapons
• Battlefield Laser Weapons Are Becoming A Reality For Pentagon Plann…
• Mind Control – The Ultimate Terror
• Global Network 19th Annual Conference Joint Declaration

Related Images:

Can interpret behavior and identify potential threats – “…The Visual Intelligence Grounded in Learning (VIGIL) project is part of the larger DARPA program known as Mind’s Eye, which is to develop a smart camera system that needs minimal human supervision, can be deployed rapidly and cost effectively in unmanned vehicles (UVs) stationed in areas under automatic surveillance, and can interpret behavior and identify potential threats from video data. “Surveillance in dangerous areas is currently performed by remote reconnaissance teams and advanced scouting patrols, who are often risking their lives,” said Hung Bui, SRI’s senior computer scientist. “While their efforts can be supplemented through the use of cameras on unmanned vehicles, such devices still require constant human monitoring to analyze ongoing activities. SRI’s VIGIL system combines automatic reasoning and machine perception to automatically analyze areas of interest while keeping members of the armed forces out of harm’s way…” (DARPA Picks Visual Intelligence System’s Design Leader)

Advanced human-computer Interaction – “…Lockheed said that analysts go through volumes of disparate ISR data from sea, air, and land assets to produce an integrated view of critical information for the warfighter. It is difficult for analysts to easily share and integrate that data. The creation of the new InsightOS will enable automated combining of sensor and intelligence data from multiple assets, dynamically re-tasking assets as necessary, and incorporating analysts into the process via advanced Human-Computer Interaction tools. As a result, the fidelity and speed of battlefield analyses will improve, increasing mission success and warfighter safety. Based in Bethesda, Maryland, Lockheed Martin is a global security company that is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services…” (Lockheed to Help Analyze Data)

Neuro-optical system – “…Awarded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Cognitive Technology Threat Warning System program, or CT2WS, is part of the U.S. Department of Defense’s effort to address a key mission need and represents a significant leap forward in technology from that available today. The goal of the CT2WS program is to drive a breakthrough in soldier-portable visual threat warning devices. Once successfully developed, the intelligent neuro-optical system will provide the warfighter with an unprecedented capability to detect targets of interest at an extremely long range over a wide field of view. In Phase One of the program, the Northrop Grumman team plans to demonstrate the concept by building a breadboard system and complete a preliminary design for the company’s Human-aided Optical Recognition/Notification of Elusive Threats (HORNET) system. HORNET will utilize a custom helmet equipped with electro-encephalogram electrodes placed on the scalp to record the user’s continuous electrical brain activity. The operator’s neural responses to the presence or absence of potential threats will train the system’s algorithms, which will continue to be refined over time so that the warfighter is always presented with items of relevance to his mission. “Northrop Grumman’s HORNET system leverages the latest advances in real-time coupling of human brain activity with automated cognitive neural processing to provide superior target detection,” says Michael House, Northrop Grumman’s CT2WS program manager. “The system will maintain persistent surveillance in order to defeat an enemy’s attempts to surprise through evasive move-stop-move tactics, giving the U.S. warfighter as much as a 20-minute advantage over his adversaries…” (Northrop Grumman-Led Team Awarded Contract to Develop Electronic Bi…)

Microchip in the brain – “…The arm, which was developed at a cost of over $100 million by DARPA and Johns Hopkins University over the past five years, is controlled by a microchip in the brain. The microchip records neuron activity and decodes the signals to activate motor neurons that control the prosthetic. DARPA’s prosthetic works much like a regular arm, with the ability to bend, rotate, and twist in 27 different ways. It is designed to restore almost complete hand and finger function to patients dealing with spinal cord injury, stroke, or amputation. Now that the arm has been expedited through the FDA’s program, Johns Hopkins will implant its microchips in five patients and monitor them for a year. There are few safety concerns, but the university anticipates issues with maintaining chip quality over time, according to the a href=”http://articles.latimes.com/2011/feb/09/nation/la-na-prosthetic-arm…″ target=”_blank”>Los Angeles Times. If all goes well, the arm could be on the market in just four to five years…” (DARPA’s Mind-Controlled Prosthetic Arm Could Be on the Market in Fo…)

Electrical current to the brain – “…Applying electricity to the brain has a long and at times dark history. Doctors, psychiatrists and other researchers have known for hundreds of years that applying electrical current to the brain can cause changes; some good, some not so much. Electrical stimulation has been used to keep executed prisoners from twitching after death, to “help” patients overcome depression and more recently to help people with injuries or brain impairments to regain functionality. This history now colors any new research as fear and skepticism tend to get in the way of serious work. This is likely the reason that this new research is being done by DARPA, rather than an independent organization; it doesn’t have to answer to anyone except the DoD. Because the amount of current is so small, volunteers report no pain, just a slight tingling sensation during the procedure, and afterwards can offer no real explanations as to why they performed better than they might have otherwise. This research, and other studies like it, have set off both alarms and intrigue in certain quarters. Some worry people, such as college students will jump on the procedure as a means to help cram for exams, others wonder if electronic devices such as blue-tooth phones are emitting electricity that might help them learn; while others yet point out, very soberly, that no one really knows just yet what long-term effects people might have from exposure to something as simple as tCDS…” (DARPA takes new look at electrical brain stimulation to aid in lear…)

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is an agency of the United States Department of Defense responsible for the development of new technology for use by the military. DARPA has been responsible for funding the development of many technologies which have had a major effect on the world, including computer networking, as well as NLS, which was both the first hypertext system, and an important precursor to the contemporary ubiquitous graphical user interface. Its original name was simply Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), but it was renamed to “DARPA” (for Defense) in March 1972, then renamed “ARPA” again in February 1993, and then renamed “DARPA” again in March 1996. DARPA was established during 1958 (as ARPA) in response to the Soviet launching of Sputnik during 1957, with the mission of keeping U.S. military technology more sophisticated than that of the nation’s potential enemies. From DARPA’s own introduction, DARPA’s original mission, established in 1958, was to prevent technological surprise like the launch of Sputnik, which signaled that the Soviets had beaten the U.S. into space. The mission statement has evolved over time. Today, DARPA’s mission is still to prevent technological surprise to the US, but also to create technological surprise for its enemies. DARPA is independent from other more conventional military R&D and reports directly to senior Department of Defense management. DARPA has around 240 personnel (about 140 technical) directly managing a $3.2 billion budget. These figures are “on average” since DARPA focuses on short-term (two to four-year) projects run by small, purpose-built teams. (Wikepedia)

YouTube videos link:

Project GreenVax

http://youtu.be/T0nukOKUiCo

DARPA Nano Air Vehicle (NAV) program

http://youtu.be/NuD1WKHsggs

The DARPA Autonomous Robotic Manipulation (ARM) program

http://youtu.be/d4rCvoX34Ew

DARPA Video and Image Retrieval and Analysis Tool (VIRAT)

http://youtu.be/LkueCrzzRrk

HAARP

http://youtu.be/MnRPZOUVhJ4

RELATED READING:

• Official Web-site: DARPA
• New DARPA tech can scan eyes in a moving crowd
• Augmented cognition: Science fact or science fiction?
• Spies, military looking for hacker-, backdoor-proof circuits
• General Atomics wins $40M to scale military laser
• Broad Operational Language Translation (BOLT)
• DARPA Joins Blue Energy and World Energy in Race to Harness Ocean P…
• DARPA To Invest $1 Billion In Defense Manufacturing
• Surveillance Dust (Presentation)
• Global Network 19th Annual Conference Joint Declaration

Related Images:

Sony Patent Takes First Step Towards Real-Life Matrix By Jenny Hogan & Barry Fox NewScientist.com 4-7-5 Imagine movies and computer games in which you get to smell, taste and perhaps even feel things. That’s the tantalising prospect raised by a patent on a device for transmitting sensory data directly into the human brain – granted to none other than the entertainment giant Sony. The technique suggested in the patent is entirely non-invasive. It describes a device that fires pulses of ultrasound at the head to modify firing patterns in targeted parts of the brain, creating “sensory experiences” ranging from moving images to tastes and sounds. This could give blind or deaf people the chance to see or hear, the patent claims. While brain implants are becoming increasingly sophisticated, the only non-invasive ways of manipulating the brain remain crude. A technique known as transcranial magnetic stimulation can activate nerves by using rapidly changing magnetic fields to induce currents in brain tissue. However, magnetic fields cannot be finely focused on small groups of brain cells, whereas ultrasound could be. If the method described by Sony really does work, it could have all sorts of uses in research and medicine, even if it is not capable of evoking sensory experiences detailed enough for the entertainment purposes envisaged in the patent. Details are sparse, and Sony declined New Scientist’s request for an interview with the inventor, who is based in its offices in San Diego, California. However, independent experts are not dismissing the idea out of hand. “I looked at it and found it plausible,” says Niels Birbaumer, a pioneering neuroscientist at the University of T

Related Images:

High-Power Microwaves – “…The peculiar thing about space warfare is that many of the innovations that sound the most far-fetched — like illuminating a battlefield at night with light that only one side can see or the deployment of high-power microwave pills — are actually much closer to existence, technologically, than some items that might seem more logically in line for development. Consider the spaceplane. It would be a tremendous tool for the military, since it could get to any point on the globe in a few hours. But building a manned craft that can quickly glide in and out of low orbits has proved incredibly daunting. Earlier this year, the X-33, NASA’s big experiment in flying into space, ended in failure. The image that most people have of “Star Wars”-style combat — manned spaceplanes engaging in dogfights near the moon — is very far off. But the use of space for weaponry directed back at earth or guided from space is pretty much at hand. “I’m particularly excited about high-power microwaves,” Beason tells me. Lacking the thousand-mile reach of lasers, H.P.M.’s, as they are called, can be projected only about a half-mile. But were an unmanned plane guided from space able to transport a high-powered microwave device close to a battlefield, the possibilities could push the Pentagon’s bomb-to-target ratio even closer to perfection. To an invading army of modern soldiers, a massive hit by high-powered microwave could ground their high-tech weapons, leaving them to wage modern warfare with their fists. The time lag between the current R.&D. on microwaves and its application in the battlefield may be a while. Beason himself estimates 15 years, although one use is on the verge of showing up in battlefields soon. On the ground, a microwave weapon could be used to drive back an invading squadron. “It’ll feel like opening the door of an oven,” Beason says. “We’re testing it on humans now.” He pauses and worries that he is bumping up against classified information. “If you want to know more,” he adds, “you’ll have to contact the Human Effectiveness Directorate…” (The next battlefield may be in Outer Space)

Domestic Intelligence Network – “…It just gets scarier. The Black Ops that Mr. Tice was involved in related to electronic intelligence gathering via space systems communications, non-communications signals, electronic warfare, satellite control, telemetry, sensors, and special capability systems.For greater insight as to the impact of these programs readers should review decades old FOIA authenticated programs such as MKULTRA, BLUEBIRD, COINTELPRO and ARTICHOKE. Radar based Telemetry involves the ability to see through walls without thermal imaging. Electronic Warfare is even scarier if we take a look at the science. NSA Signals Intelligence Use of EMF Brain Stimulation. NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF Brain Stimulation has been in development since the MKUltra program of the early 1950′s, which included neurological research into “radiation” (non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development. The resulting secret technology is categorized at the National Security Archives as “Radiation Intelligence,” defined as “information from unintentionally emanated electromagnetic waves in the environment, not including radioactivity or nuclear detonation.” Signals Intelligence implemented and kept this technology secret in the same manner as other electronic warfare programs of the U.S. government. The NSA monitors available information about this technology and withholds scientific research from the public. There are also international intelligence agency agreements to keep this technology secret. The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyzes electrical activity in humans from a distance. NSA computer-generated brain mapping can continuously monitor all the electrical activity in the brain continuously. The NSA records and decodes individual brain maps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for national security purposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by the military for Brain-to-computer link (In military fighter aircraft, for example). For electronic surveillance purposes electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject’s verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain’s auditory cortex thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia. Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject’s brain and show images from the subject’s brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject’s eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to the visual cortex. bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject’s brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes. Individual citizens occasionally targeted for surveillance by independently operating NSA personnel NSA personnel can control the lives of hundreds of thousands of individuals in the U.S. by using the NSA’s domestic intelligence network and cover businesses. The operations independently run by them can sometimes go beyond the bounds of law. Long-term control and sabotage of tens of thousands of unwitting citizens by NSA operatives is likely to happen. NSA Domint has the ability to covertly assassinate U.S. citizens or run covert psychological control operations to cause subjects to be diagnosed with ill mental health. National Security Agency Signals Intelligence Electronic Brain Link Technology NSA SigInt can remotely detect, identify and monitor a person’s bioelectric fields…” (Is the NSA Conducting Electronic Warfare On Americans?)

Space warfare is combat that takes place in outer space, i.e. outside the atmosphere. Space warfare therefore includes ground-to-space warfare, such as attacking satellites from the Earth, as well as space-to-space warfare, such as satellites attacking satellites. It does not include the use of satellites for espionage, surveillance, or military communications, however useful those activities might be. It does not technically include space-to-ground warfare, where orbital objects attack ground, sea or air targets directly, but the public and media frequently use the term to include any conflict which includes space as a theater of operations, regardless of the intended target. For example, a rapid delivery system in which troops are deployed from orbit might be described as “space warfare,” even though the military uses the term as described above. A film was produced by the U.S. Military in the early 1960s called Space and National Security which depicted space warfare. From 1985 to 2002 there was a United States Space Command, which in 2002 merged with the United States Strategic Command. There is a Russian Space Force, which was established on August 10, 1992, and which became an independent section of the Russian military on June 1, 2001. Only a few incidents of space warfare have occurred in world history, and all were training missions, as opposed to actions against real opposing forces. In the mid-1980s a USAF pilot in an F-15 successfully shot down the P78-1, a communications satellite in a 345 mile (555 km) orbit. In 2007 the People’s Republic of China used a missile system to destroy one of its obsolete satellites (see 2007 Chinese anti-satellite missile test), and in 2008 the United States similarly destroyed its malfunctioning satellite USA 193. To date, there have been no human casualties resulting from conflict in space, nor has any ground target been successfully neutralized from orbit. International treaties governing space limit or regulate conflicts in space and limit the installation of weapon systems, especially nuclear weapons…Directed-Energy Weapons – A USAF Boeing YAL-1 airborne laser.Weapon systems that fall under this category include lasers, linear particle accelerators or particle-beam based weaponry, microwaves and plasma-based weaponry. Particle beams involve the acceleration of charged or neutral particles in a stream towards a target at extremely high velocities, the impact of which creates a reaction causing immense damage. Most of these weapons are theoretical or impractical to implement currently, aside from lasers which are starting to be used in terrestrial warfare. That said, directed-energy weapons are more practical and more effective in a vacuum (i.e. space) than in the Earth’s atmosphere, as in the atmosphere the particles of air interfere with and disperse the directed energy. Obviously, that problem would not occur in space. (Wikepedia)

YouTube videos link:
No Navy base In Peaceful Island, Jeju .mp4

“PAX AMERICANA and the Weaponization of Space” TRAILER

Coast To Coast AM: Electronic Harassment & Warfare 2-22-2011 Download Link

http://youtu.be/BvyWjCEOAkg
electronic harassment devices

RELATED READING:

Russia test launches Bulava strategic missile
The Next Battlefield May Be in Outer Space
Mystery Electronic Warfare Scheme Blanks Israeli Satellite TV
Drone missiles depersonalize warfare
The spy who came in from the desert
CPI Satcom Division
U.S. deploys warfare unit to jam enemy satellites
Raising the Bar on Advanced Signal Simulation
The Air Force Law Review
Chapter: “Electronic Warfare”
Radar Devices
Retired British military intelligence scientist talks about microwa…
Mind Control – The Ultimate Terror
Actual Patents Of Mind Control And Behavior Modification Technology
Global Network 19th Annual Conference Joint Declaration

Related Images:

High energy microwave devices — “…This is the most dangerous form of electronic harassment and is quite easy to implement against a person. Directed harmful high energy microwave devices and weapons can include such devices and equipment that are easily available almost anywhere in the World where there are people. Microwave ovens can be modified to focus and direct up to 1200 watts or more, depending on the model, of microwave energy at a person or property and are easy to produce. The results of an attack by a high energy device can be lethal, they can kill or at the least disable a human being or other animals. Attacks from high energy microwave weapons leave blisters, cause internal bruising and/or bleeding, stimulate cancer, cause cataracts, encourage tumors to grow, generate boils, or leave red patches on the skin. Directed Harmful High Energy Weapons will have effective ranges from the point of contact to several hundred yards. Directed Harmful High Energy Weapons can be used to destroy electronic devices and cause severe interference in computers and alarm systems which can allow forced entry or destruction of vital data. Radar guns are available from surplus stores most anywhere and can be obtained from ex-military sources or even police departments. Radar gun power outputs range from a two or three watts to 3 Megawatts! Portable radar guns range in size from small hand held devices to vehicle mounted long range high power models. These devices have very long ranges due to their greater power, higher frequencies and shorter wavelength. Radar guns emit long or short pulses of high energy capable of causing instant damage or death to living creatures. Semiconductor destruction or malfunction, brain damage & stopping vehicles are other uses for these devices. Other forms of directed harmful high energy include devices such as tasers, klystron guns (radar guns), ion beam guns, plasma pulse guns, soliton bombs, and many more devices…” (Electronic Harassment)
Electronic pulses from radar — “…Radar is an electronic system that detects and tracks distant objects like aircraft and ships. Radar transmits radio waves (at 300,000 km/sec.), and precisely monitors the electronic echo reflected by objects in the area of the transmission. Aircraft and ships also use electronic pulses from radar to track nearby landmasses when darkness or poor weather make visual navigation difficult or impossible. RCAF radar veterans of the Second World War formed the Canadian Radar History Project to collect and record information about their accomplishments and experiences. This exhibition provides a sampling of the important research these veterans — now in their 70′s and 80′s- have done to ensure that their story will survive for future generations.” (Canadian Radar History)
Powerful hailer and sonic blasters — “…Manufactured by American Technology Corporation (ATC), the firm’s LRAD 500-x is a dual-purpose device: a powerful hailer and a non-lethal weapon capable of producing ear-shattering sounds highly-damaging to their human targets. ATC’s technology has been deployed in Iraq as an “anti-insurgent weapon” and off the coast of Somalia to fight off desperate “pirates,” that is, former Somali fishermen whose livelihood has been destroyed by over-fishing by foreign factory fleets and toxic dumping, including nuclear waste, by Western polluters. No matter, time to break out the sonic blasters! Developed for the U.S. Navy in the wake of the 2000 attack on the U.S.S. Cole, cruise ship Captain Michael Groves “successfully repelled pirates off the Somali coast using non-lethal weapons including an LRAD. Groves has since filed suit against Carnival Cruise Line, claiming he suffered permanent hearing loss as a result,” East County Magazine reports…” (Compliance by Design: The Continuing Allure of “Non-Lethal” Weapons)
Auditory effect — “…But as disturbing as Raytheon’s ADS may be, there are systems about to come “on-line” that are far, far worse. New Scientist recently described how one enterprising outfit of capitalist grifters, the Sierra Nevada Corporation, is “ready to build a microwave ray gun able to beam sounds directly into people’s heads,” David Hambling reports. Touted as the “next big thing,” MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) will eventually be deployed for “crowd-control” applications in U.S. military “operations other than war.” According to Hambling, MEDUSA exploits the microwave audio effect, in which short microwave pulses rapidly heat tissue, causing a shockwave inside the skull that can be detected by the ears. A series of pulses can be transmitted to produce recognisable sounds. (“Microwave Ray Gun Controls Crowds with Noise,” New Scientist, July 3, 2008). Sierra Nevada Corporation’s Lev Sadovnik is working on the latest in a series of “active denial systems” under contract with the U.S. Navy which said in a preliminary report that the device “was shown to be effective.” According to its manufacturer, MEDUSA involves an “auditory effect” loud enough to “cause discomfort or even incapacitation…” (“Non-Lethal” Weapons: Where Science and Technology Service Repression)
Neuro-optical system — “…Awarded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Cognitive Technology Threat Warning System program, or CT2WS, is part of the U.S. Department of Defense’s effort to address a key mission need and represents a significant leap forward in technology from that available today. The goal of the CT2WS program is to drive a breakthrough in soldier-portable visual threat warning devices. Once successfully developed, the intelligent neuro-optical system will provide the warfighter with an unprecedented capability to detect targets of interest at an extremely long range over a wide field of view. In Phase One of the program, the Northrop Grumman team plans to demonstrate the concept by building a breadboard system and complete a preliminary design for the company’s Human-aided Optical Recognition/Notification of Elusive Threats (HORNET) system. HORNET will utilize a custom helmet equipped with electro-encephalogram electrodes placed on the scalp to record the user’s continuous electrical brain activity. The operator’s neural responses to the presence or absence of potential threats will train the system’s algorithms, which will continue to be refined over time so that the warfighter is always presented with items of relevance to his mission. “Northrop Grumman’s HORNET system leverages the latest advances in real-time coupling of human brain activity with automated cognitive neural processing to provide superior target detection,” says Michael House, Northrop Grumman’s CT2WS program manager. “The system will maintain persistent surveillance in order to defeat an enemy’s attempts to surprise through evasive move-stop-move tactics, giving the U.S. warfighter as much as a 20-minute advantage over his adversaries…” (Northrop Grumman-Led Team Awarded Contract to Develop Electronic Bi…)
Laws against electronic harassment — Electronic harassment is a term referring to the use of electronic devices to harass, torture, and/or physically harm a person, not to be confused with cyberstalking. Laws against electronic harassment: (1) Michigan — Public act 257 of 2003 makes it a felony for a person to “manufacture, deliver, possess, transport, place, use, or release” a “harmful electronic or electromagnetic device” for “an unlawful purpose”; also made into a felony is the act of causing “an individual to falsely believe that the individual has been exposed to a…harmful electronic or electromagnetic device.” (2) Maine — Public law 264, H.P. 868 — L.D. 1271 criminalizes the knowing, intentional, and/or reckless use of an electronic weapon on another person, defining an electronic weapon as a portable device or weapon emitting an electrical current, impulse, beam, or wave with disabling effects on a human being. (3) Massachusetts — Chapter 170 of the Acts of 2004, Section 140 of the General Laws, section 131J states: “No person shall possess a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to incapacitate temporarily, injure or kill, except … Whoever violates this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the house of correction for not less than 6 months nor more than 2 1/2 years, or by both such fine and imprisonment.” (Wikepedia)
Youtube videos link:
electronic harassment devices

Lockpicking Tools of The Trade

NEW HEAT-RAY DEVICE (ADS) BEING TESTED ON PRISONERS IN CALIFORNIA 8-20-2010
http://youtu.be/zBfFRKkmwYw
Microwave radiation dangers in your home –

NASA’s Subvocal Speech Detector
http://youtu.be/kfrsQPFlKLI
HEARING VOICES – NO MENTAL ILLNESS-HARASSMENT

RELATED READING:

Related Images: