(Truthstream Media) On a field trip. Been reading about how we never really got an honest safety study on microwave radiation after WWII… Big surprise.

There are lots of details explaining why the public has not been made aware of the dangers of microwaves, ELF and other frequencies that are used silently and invisibly, but suffice to say that the establishment is not interested in the population being made aware of the control measures being used against it, the fences surrounding it and the lengths taken to keep us all in the dark.

ALSO: Check Out This Piece of Crap Fake Tree Cell Tower

So there are lots of hidden and disguised cell towers that have been exposed out there, but this one was just a bit too conspicuous not to call it out for the monstrosity it is… something we saw traveling through Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

P.S. There should be plenty more adventures from the road and more reports on the way, so please stay tuned at youtube.com/user/truthstreammedia

Tuesday, 30 June 2015 09:19 By Derek Royden, Occupy.com | News Analysis

It’s well established that the FBI surveilled civil rights and other activists from Martin Luther King Jr. to leaders of the National Lawyers Guild as part of its wide ranging COINTELPRO (counter intelligence program) during the 1960s and early 70s. The use of planted news stories, faked communications to create dissension within activist groups, informants to make dubious cases and even assassinations was revealed by a group of activists called the Citizens’ Commission to Investigate the FBI, who broke into a bureau office in Media, Pennsylvania, in 1971 and found ample evidence of the agency’s misdeeds. This is generally seen as an era of terrible government overreach in the name of fighting “communism.”

The problem is that the use of similar tactics has been discovered again and again in the years since. Following the anti-globalization protests of 1999, the 9/11 attacks, and the Occupy protests of 2011, similar strategies, enhanced by modern technology, have been ratcheted up and deployed against an ever-increasing number of activists and political groups of all ideological stripes as part of the even more dubious “wars” on drugs and terrorism.

Part of this is due to the fact that there simply aren’t enough real threats of terrorism to justify all the money and toys that have been given to U.S. law enforcement. Add to this the fact that police at all levels seem eager to see potential terrorism in even the mildest forms of dissent and you have a recipe for disaster. In one of the most recent instances, it was revealed that the FBI has been coordinating with local law enforcement to target the Black Lives Matter movement.

Another story, unrelated to current anti-racist organizing, is a bizarre case out of Minneapolis in the lead up to the Republican national convention in 2008. According to the City Pages, a Univ. of Minnesota police officer who was the department’s only officer on the local Joint Counter Terrorism Task Force worked with an FBI Special Agent to recruit college students who acted as paid informants at “vegan potlucks” hoping they’d discover activist plans to disrupt the city’s upcoming convention.

Extending the Long Arm of the Law

Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), of which there are currently 104 located in cities and towns across the United States, were created in the 1980s and greatly expanded in the aftermath of 9/11. They were set up to coordinate between diverse federal agencies and local law enforcement, and often work in tandem with “Fusion Centers” that are supposed to collect and analyze data related to potential terrorism.

To see how these task forces can overstep their bounds, take the case of Eric Linsker, who police tried to arrest for allegedly trying to throw a trash can over the side of a walkway on the Brooklyn Bridge during the large, mostly peaceful protests that erupted in New York City following the failure to indict the officer whose choke-hold led to the death of Eric Garner. Other protesters intervened to stop the arrest but Linkser left his bag behind which, according to authorities, contained “his passport, three hammers, and a small amount of marijuana.”

While police may have been well within their rights to track down Linsker and charge him if the vandalism allegations were true, it’s who did the arresting that is problematic: rather than the NYPD, it was the New York JTTF that brought Linkser in, perhaps believing that the hammers were potential instruments of terror. This should be a cause for worry, since it means either law enforcement’s definition of terrorism has become far too broad, or they are targeting more than just terrorism.

Stingrays and the Dangers of Technology

Activists with Occupy Wall Street, and later Black Lives Matter, have relied on social networks and technology to organize their efforts. Ubiquitous phones with video recording capacity have revealed abuses of power by law enforcement and discredited official stories. Smart phones are also useful during marches to inform other protesters on the fly about concentrations of police, allowing demonstrators to change their routes to avoid confrontation.

As one “counter-terrorism expert” told the New York Post in regards to Black Lives Matter protests in early December: “They wore me out. Their ability to strategize on the fly is something we haven’t dealt with before to this degree.”

Unfortunately, like most 21st century technology, the use of smart phones by activists has become a double-edged sword, exposing them to surveillance risks that were unimaginable in previous eras. One such technology is Stingray, produced by Harris Technology, which mimics a cell phone tower and allows law enforcement to pull GPS and other data from phones within their range.

In an interesting case reported by Wired magazine, police in Erie County, NY, used the technology 47 times in the last five years and only received the required permission from a court once. Even in that case, “they asked for a court order rather than a warrant, which carries a higher burden of proof… (and) mischaracterized the true nature of the tool.”

The same story notes that the New York Civil Liberties Union posted documents online that showed the FBI and local police departments had made binding agreements to keep their use of the technology secret, even going so far as to ask courts to dismiss criminal cases in which the use of Stingray might be revealed.

The unique moment created by anti-police brutality protests throughout the U.S. last year – and coming on the heels of a federally coordinated effort to dismantle Occupy encampments in 2011 – revealed that federal police agencies, especially the FBI, working with local police have directed their resources as much against protesters, dissenters and those practicing and civil disobedience as they have against the threat represented by terrorists, whether homegrown “lone wolves” or organized outside groups.

While the recent NSA reform bill passed in Congress represents a victory for civil liberties and privacy advocates, there’s still a ways to go. Because while the right to dissent remains a fundamental American freedom, the fear of terrorism being openly exploited by law enforcement has allowed police to resurrect COINTELPRO in all but name.

Joan Dawson, Writer-Editor

Ph/fax 240-839-7329
www.joandawson.net

“The whole course of human history may depend on a change of heart in one solitary and even humble individual – for it is in the solitary mind and soul of the individual that the battle between good and evil is waged and ultimately won or lost.” –M. Scott Peck

Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2015/06/nanoparticles-enable-remote-control.html

By Nicholas West

A couple of years ago, a story emerged about scientists working on “Smart Dust” – nanoparticles that could be employed as sensor networks for a range of security and environmental applications. This was followed by the more literal version of Smart Dust, which was designed to open pathways to establish a human brain-computer interface.

The brain system was labeled “Neural Dust” and was intended to “monitor the brain from the inside.” Inventors speculated that a network of nanoparticles injected into the brain could measure electrical activity in neurons, then use ultrasound to form a two-way transfer of data. This theoretically would lead to the reading, generation, or alteration of information – i.e., mind control. Most disturbingly, at the time, is that their theories had entered the testing phase and showed some success, albeit on a beetle.

New research released by Florida International University indicates that this area of testing has now advanced to mice. Their conclusions and statements about what they have found and where they believe all of this is headed is even less comforting than previous discoveries.

I have posted the full FIU press release below, with emphasis and my comments added. Naturally, their press release highlights only the potential benefits of this technology. One can’t outright deny those possibilities, but we also must put it into perspective knowing what we do about DARPA’s mission to apply this militarily.  For key background into that research please read “7 Future Methods of Mind Control” and the explosive details that came to Activist Post from an Arizona State University whistleblower about what led him to reveal his intense concerns, “Secret DARPA Mind Control Project Revealed: Leaked Document.”

This is going to be a very short post and has been mentioned in greater detail in the past.

The problem of introducing nano technology in our food sources and the use of criminal groups to ship and stock food onto our grocery shelves.

By my own experience, I know this is the sole reason for the attacks that targeted individuals are experiencing.

Once a person consumes these products, they are inflected with attacks to different parts of the body. This is through electro-magnetic energy, which manipulates the technology in your body.

The criminal networks have learned that if they can gain access to the food system, they can manipulate the whole process.

The entire food system is operated by trust, besides, there is a money factor in overseeing food safety operations. Almost all guarantees of food safety is given to the manager. So these criminal networks have learned to manipulate their way inside a business by targeting the manager position.

That’s why it is so common to see an entire different manager on your second trip to the store. Thereafter, the same manager is seen, regardless how many times you might visit that establishment.

To know if a business has been infiltrated, you will notice a large amount of people stocking the shelves. The reason is the technology that they are putting in the food have a shelf life.

For instance, when you consume the food after an immediate purchase, the attacks are worse than, if you allow the purchase food sit for several days.

Also, the amount of food consumed and how it is prepared will affect your targeting. Unfortunately, I have found fried foods and over cooked boiled foods (if you can get access to clean drinking water) better than fresh fruits when dealing with the targeting. Sugary foods is an absolute no, no. Especially ice creams and chocolates.

With that said, when one talks about the targeting, what we consume should be a part of the equation. We put too much emphasis on the electro-magnetic weapons without really understanding the whole targeting process.

My legality breakdown:

John Norseen passed away Sept. 27, 2007. He was a former Navy pilot and neuroengineer for Lockheed Martin who received research contracts from The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the Army’s National Ground Intelligence Center.

“If this research pans out, says Norseen, “you can begin to manipulate what someone is thinking even before they know it.” But Norseen says he is “agnostic” on the moral ramifications, that he’s not a mad scientist–just a dedicated one. “The ethics don’t concern me,” he says, “but they should concern someone else.””
~ U.S. News & World Report, January 3, 2000
——————————————————————————————
“After answering a number of pragmatic questions about the state of Information Warfare today, Norseen was then questioned about the ethics of such research. In response to this question, he said:

“…the full impact of brain research on future military and civilian activities is not well understood in the current National Security domain.

Click Here To Read More

February 3, 2015 – An innocent Targeted Individual (TI) underwent surgery Friday in California for removal of 5 secretly implanted biomedical devices in his physique. In a key breakthrough for him and possibly thousands of other TIs, the “foreign bodies” health-related specialists have analyzed have been identified in that they comprised of waveguides and nanotechnology.

The specialist anlysis accounts for inhumane suffering through involuntary physique movements that Cain has described as hell. It is also a feasible breakthrough for thousands of other TIs who claim illegal implantation and becoming tortured..

According to court documents, in TI Richard Cain and his two kids allegedly had been implanted at St. John’s Regional Medical Center and St. John’s Pleasant Valley Hospital in 2008 in a non-consensual human health-related research program. For over 5 years, Cain’s family has knowledgeable hell, which includes involuntary movements, as a lot of TIs contacting Deborah Dupré complain in their written accounts.

Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/news/Secretly_Forced_Chips_In_Targeted_Individual_Removed_Identified/113708#ixzz3YMDUg3X8

Dear Readers,

I received three emails recently concerning doing a show on surveillance issues.

The first one is a shortwave broadcast out of the state of Maine. This is the only broadcast that operates over the airwaves. Most of the programs are of a political right perspective.

The second email is from an African American webcaster and of course his station (which he calls channels) is geared to an Africa American audience.

The third email is from a progressive radio webcast that targets the left lending community.

Since the targeted individual population is so widespread in its political ideology, we feel each outfit offers a unique set of benefits.

But first we need to line up a group of hosts and producers. I still don’t have an idea of who will be participating.

If you are a targeted individual and will be interested in exploring one of these options (hosting or producing), please feel free to contact me (below).

We are looking for innovative and insightful individuals who want to make a difference in the targeted individual community.

• Christopher J. Brunson
• Telephone: (980) 285-7954