A landmark victory has occurred this week for Targeted Individuals (TIs) suffering torturous government mind control technology. For years, thousands of TIs have approached mainstream media sources with their accounts, only to be dismissed as much as government agencies do when TIs ask for recognition and aid. One major news outlet has broken this cover-up regarding mind control and remote neural monitoring of today’s abused targets, including those brain-chipped.

[More: See Secretly forced brain implants, 4-Part Series:

Part I: Secretly forced brain implants: Explosive court case

Part II: Secretly forced brain implants: MRI scan image, medical and investigative reports

Part III: Secretly forced brain implants: Top SS, FBI agent defends chipped targets

Part IV: Secretly forced brain implants: Intel expert on the doctors, children, military research

With the original title “Control mental. El sueño dorado de los dueños del mundo” (Mind control. The golden dream of the world’s masters), Russia Today broadcasted to some 10 million people, the truth about TIs being subjected to military non-consensual human experimentation, the type John Finch describes as “Mengele-type experimentation.” The Russia Today program is viewed as one of the biggest victories for victims of implant technologies to date.

Thanks to Magnus Olsson, who, despite being a victim, and Daniel Estulin, both of whom have worked tirelessly for several years to expose one the biggest human rights abuses of our times: connecting people against their will and knowledge to computers via implants of the size of a few nanometers – leading to a complete destruction of not only their lives and health, but also personalities and identities.

The common response to “Targeted Individuals'” accounts and pleas for help to survive the torturous treatment is, in a word, dismissal . Whether it be family members, friends, professionals or article readers, the response is usually the same, according to this reporter’s volumes of emails from over 500 TIs from around the world. Even worse, most observers attribute the TI suffering to mental illness, thus revictimizing the target. After this author published an article Monday on Before It’s News about a Victoria, Australia TI’s claims of alleged abuse, the leading commenter, “dabu,”  wrote:

Dear Bioethics Commission,

I would like to thank this commission for their efforts to recommend ethical protections for human subjects.

Ethical protections for human subjects are essential considering the past history of non-consensual research by United States Military and intelligence agencies in collaboration with educational institutions such as Harvard, John Hopkins, MIT, Princeton, and Stanford; pharmaceutical companies such as Eli Lily; medical schools and hospitals; the American Psychological Association; the National Institutes of Health, the Veterans Administration Center, U.S. Public Health Service  and others.

Examples of past non-consensual experimentation include the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, The Manhattan Project, The Willowbrook Experiment, and Radiation Experiments.

Mind control experiments such as Project CHATTER, Project BLUEBIRD, Project ARTICHOKE, Project MKULTRA, Project MKSEARCH, Project MKNAOMI and others were often interwoven with radiation experiments and research on chemical and biological weapons.  Psychiatrists, psychologists, neurosurgeons and other contractors conducting the work were embedded in a broad network of doctors and some of the research was published in medical journals.

As previously reported to this commission in 2011 and continuing to be reported in increasing numbers to this day United States citizens and others are reporting non-consensual experimentation including remote experimentation and torture.  In 2011 it was reported to this commission that there were approximately 3000 known victims.  Four years later those numbers have grown to 4000  to 5000 victims, an increase of at least 33%.  I have brought with me over 60 of their statements.

Non-consensual victims of experimentation have experienced covert COINTELPRO type tactics including those used in Project MKDELTA.  MKDELTA materials were used for harassment, discrediting, or disabling purposes.

Due to past history, previous testimony and statements provided to this commission, and continuing reports of non-consensual research ethical protections for human subjects in the form of regulatory changes are critical.

As I understand Subpart A of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) regulations, Protection of Human Subjects (codified at 45 C.F.R Part 46), also known as the Common Rule loopholes allow for experimentation when there is no physical intervention or interaction with the subject by an investigator as occurs in remote experimentation and previously reported to this commission by victims; or when the identify of the subject is unknown to the investigator (for example Subject 9,543).

Also there is no oversight for some non-federal entities such as private corporations and contractors and foreign entities; as well as some federal departments and agencies.  Oversight is needed for all entities conducting research on American citizens and U.S. persons as well as research conducted on foreign soil.

Additionally research activities are permitted for some demonstration and service programs for public benefit; department or agency heads can waive consent in certain cases; institutions can register their own institutional review board (IRB); and IRBs can waive consent in certain instances.  There are other loopholes not described here.   Additional protections are also needed for children, prisoners and those of impaired consent.

In light of the testimony given in 2011 and existing loopholes in federal regulations I was shocked and dismayed that the only notable recommendation the Bioethics Commission made regarding the consent process is to add people of impaired consent.  Ethical protections for human subjects necessitate regulatory changes.

After experiencing painful vibrations in my forehead with associated blood in my mucous, vibrations of my organs and more I sought help in the form of testing.

Test results included materials specifically used in the manufacture of neural dust as researched and developed by the University of California, Berkley. Neural Dust is an ultrasonic low power implantable form of brain-machine interface which as originally designed includes a subdural transceiver, an external transceiver and cmos chips implanted into the cortex.

The University of California has collaborative agreements with Temple University, which in turn has collaborative agreements with Dartmouth University and Dartmouth Hitchcock Hospital where I had surgery on my nose and face.

Additionally, an ELF/EMF scan found 20 sites on my body that emit emf emissions beyond normal for the human body and consistent with implants.  Also, the scan showed my body receiving governmental frequencies that were not observed during ambient conditions; my body was acting as a receiver.

This is only one example of the continued collaboration between United States government agencies and others who receive funding from those agencies.

I do not consent nor  have I  knowingly consented to any form of research, experimentation or implantation.

Not everyone can afford to pay for testing nor should we have to.   We need the medical community to evaluate our medical complaints in a scientific manner and not subjectively rule out complaints as mental illness.  We also need an investigation into our complaints of non-consensual research and covert psychological operations.

In addition to regulatory changes, criminal penalties must be legislated for research involving human subjects when bodily integrity and autonomy are violated as for other criminals who are routinely punished with convictions for assault, fraud and homicide.  Unethical treatment of human beings can only be prosecuted when laws and regulations are in place.

Even if a researcher, physician, institution, other is engaged in socially beneficial research that might lead to cures or treatments for devastating diseases it is imperative that each person’s autonomy, self-determination, human dignity and constitutional rights prevail over scientific advancement and social benefit.

Over fifty years ago American citizens reported being victims of non-consensual human experimentation and reports continue to this day.  Over fifty years later we still don’t have the necessary reforms to protect U.S. citizens and others from non-consensual research.  As a society we must ensure that research subjects possess human rights that are inviolate.

This commission includes members of institutions that have participated in unethical research in the past.  This commission does not include a single victim of non-consensual research.  They have the insight that only a victim could impart.

Thank you for your efforts to recommend ethical protections for human subjects.  Much work still remains to be done.

Sincerely,

Karla Smith

(Truthstream Media) On a field trip. Been reading about how we never really got an honest safety study on microwave radiation after WWII… Big surprise.

There are lots of details explaining why the public has not been made aware of the dangers of microwaves, ELF and other frequencies that are used silently and invisibly, but suffice to say that the establishment is not interested in the population being made aware of the control measures being used against it, the fences surrounding it and the lengths taken to keep us all in the dark.

ALSO: Check Out This Piece of Crap Fake Tree Cell Tower

So there are lots of hidden and disguised cell towers that have been exposed out there, but this one was just a bit too conspicuous not to call it out for the monstrosity it is… something we saw traveling through Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

P.S. There should be plenty more adventures from the road and more reports on the way, so please stay tuned at youtube.com/user/truthstreammedia

Tuesday, 30 June 2015 09:19 By Derek Royden, Occupy.com | News Analysis

It’s well established that the FBI surveilled civil rights and other activists from Martin Luther King Jr. to leaders of the National Lawyers Guild as part of its wide ranging COINTELPRO (counter intelligence program) during the 1960s and early 70s. The use of planted news stories, faked communications to create dissension within activist groups, informants to make dubious cases and even assassinations was revealed by a group of activists called the Citizens’ Commission to Investigate the FBI, who broke into a bureau office in Media, Pennsylvania, in 1971 and found ample evidence of the agency’s misdeeds. This is generally seen as an era of terrible government overreach in the name of fighting “communism.”

The problem is that the use of similar tactics has been discovered again and again in the years since. Following the anti-globalization protests of 1999, the 9/11 attacks, and the Occupy protests of 2011, similar strategies, enhanced by modern technology, have been ratcheted up and deployed against an ever-increasing number of activists and political groups of all ideological stripes as part of the even more dubious “wars” on drugs and terrorism.

Part of this is due to the fact that there simply aren’t enough real threats of terrorism to justify all the money and toys that have been given to U.S. law enforcement. Add to this the fact that police at all levels seem eager to see potential terrorism in even the mildest forms of dissent and you have a recipe for disaster. In one of the most recent instances, it was revealed that the FBI has been coordinating with local law enforcement to target the Black Lives Matter movement.

Another story, unrelated to current anti-racist organizing, is a bizarre case out of Minneapolis in the lead up to the Republican national convention in 2008. According to the City Pages, a Univ. of Minnesota police officer who was the department’s only officer on the local Joint Counter Terrorism Task Force worked with an FBI Special Agent to recruit college students who acted as paid informants at “vegan potlucks” hoping they’d discover activist plans to disrupt the city’s upcoming convention.

Extending the Long Arm of the Law

Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), of which there are currently 104 located in cities and towns across the United States, were created in the 1980s and greatly expanded in the aftermath of 9/11. They were set up to coordinate between diverse federal agencies and local law enforcement, and often work in tandem with “Fusion Centers” that are supposed to collect and analyze data related to potential terrorism.

To see how these task forces can overstep their bounds, take the case of Eric Linsker, who police tried to arrest for allegedly trying to throw a trash can over the side of a walkway on the Brooklyn Bridge during the large, mostly peaceful protests that erupted in New York City following the failure to indict the officer whose choke-hold led to the death of Eric Garner. Other protesters intervened to stop the arrest but Linkser left his bag behind which, according to authorities, contained “his passport, three hammers, and a small amount of marijuana.”

While police may have been well within their rights to track down Linsker and charge him if the vandalism allegations were true, it’s who did the arresting that is problematic: rather than the NYPD, it was the New York JTTF that brought Linkser in, perhaps believing that the hammers were potential instruments of terror. This should be a cause for worry, since it means either law enforcement’s definition of terrorism has become far too broad, or they are targeting more than just terrorism.

Stingrays and the Dangers of Technology

Activists with Occupy Wall Street, and later Black Lives Matter, have relied on social networks and technology to organize their efforts. Ubiquitous phones with video recording capacity have revealed abuses of power by law enforcement and discredited official stories. Smart phones are also useful during marches to inform other protesters on the fly about concentrations of police, allowing demonstrators to change their routes to avoid confrontation.

As one “counter-terrorism expert” told the New York Post in regards to Black Lives Matter protests in early December: “They wore me out. Their ability to strategize on the fly is something we haven’t dealt with before to this degree.”

Unfortunately, like most 21st century technology, the use of smart phones by activists has become a double-edged sword, exposing them to surveillance risks that were unimaginable in previous eras. One such technology is Stingray, produced by Harris Technology, which mimics a cell phone tower and allows law enforcement to pull GPS and other data from phones within their range.

In an interesting case reported by Wired magazine, police in Erie County, NY, used the technology 47 times in the last five years and only received the required permission from a court once. Even in that case, “they asked for a court order rather than a warrant, which carries a higher burden of proof… (and) mischaracterized the true nature of the tool.”

The same story notes that the New York Civil Liberties Union posted documents online that showed the FBI and local police departments had made binding agreements to keep their use of the technology secret, even going so far as to ask courts to dismiss criminal cases in which the use of Stingray might be revealed.

The unique moment created by anti-police brutality protests throughout the U.S. last year – and coming on the heels of a federally coordinated effort to dismantle Occupy encampments in 2011 – revealed that federal police agencies, especially the FBI, working with local police have directed their resources as much against protesters, dissenters and those practicing and civil disobedience as they have against the threat represented by terrorists, whether homegrown “lone wolves” or organized outside groups.

While the recent NSA reform bill passed in Congress represents a victory for civil liberties and privacy advocates, there’s still a ways to go. Because while the right to dissent remains a fundamental American freedom, the fear of terrorism being openly exploited by law enforcement has allowed police to resurrect COINTELPRO in all but name.

Joan Dawson, Writer-Editor

Ph/fax 240-839-7329
www.joandawson.net

“The whole course of human history may depend on a change of heart in one solitary and even humble individual – for it is in the solitary mind and soul of the individual that the battle between good and evil is waged and ultimately won or lost.” –M. Scott Peck

Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2015/06/nanoparticles-enable-remote-control.html

By Nicholas West

A couple of years ago, a story emerged about scientists working on “Smart Dust” – nanoparticles that could be employed as sensor networks for a range of security and environmental applications. This was followed by the more literal version of Smart Dust, which was designed to open pathways to establish a human brain-computer interface.

The brain system was labeled “Neural Dust” and was intended to “monitor the brain from the inside.” Inventors speculated that a network of nanoparticles injected into the brain could measure electrical activity in neurons, then use ultrasound to form a two-way transfer of data. This theoretically would lead to the reading, generation, or alteration of information – i.e., mind control. Most disturbingly, at the time, is that their theories had entered the testing phase and showed some success, albeit on a beetle.

New research released by Florida International University indicates that this area of testing has now advanced to mice. Their conclusions and statements about what they have found and where they believe all of this is headed is even less comforting than previous discoveries.

I have posted the full FIU press release below, with emphasis and my comments added. Naturally, their press release highlights only the potential benefits of this technology. One can’t outright deny those possibilities, but we also must put it into perspective knowing what we do about DARPA’s mission to apply this militarily.  For key background into that research please read “7 Future Methods of Mind Control” and the explosive details that came to Activist Post from an Arizona State University whistleblower about what led him to reveal his intense concerns, “Secret DARPA Mind Control Project Revealed: Leaked Document.”